PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHH vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHH vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SCHH having a 12.43% return and VTV slightly lower at 11.91%. Over the past 10 years, SCHH has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of 4.14%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.42% annualized return.


SCHH

1D
-1.35%
1M
-0.72%
YTD
12.43%
6M
12.55%
1Y
12.92%
3Y*
9.97%
5Y*
2.78%
10Y*
4.14%

VTV

1D
0.25%
1M
2.67%
YTD
11.91%
6M
13.41%
1Y
25.49%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
12.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHH vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
12.43%2.20%4.99%11.18%-24.99%41.07%-14.81%22.85%-4.26%3.68%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
11.91%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHH and VTV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011

0.63

The correlation between SCHH and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHH vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHH
VTV

Real Estate

98.5%
2.8%

Basic Materials

1.3%
3.1%

Financial Services

0.2%
22.3%

Communication Services

-

3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

9.4%

Energy

-

8.1%

Healthcare

-

14.5%

Industrials

-

14.0%

Technology

-

13.4%

Utilities

-

5.2%

Real Estate

SCHH
98.5%
VTV
2.8%

Basic Materials

SCHH
1.3%
VTV
3.1%

Financial Services

SCHH
0.2%
VTV
22.3%

Communication Services

SCHH

-

VTV
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHH

-

VTV
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

SCHH

-

VTV
9.4%

Energy

SCHH

-

VTV
8.1%

Healthcare

SCHH

-

VTV
14.5%

Industrials

SCHH

-

VTV
14.0%

Technology

SCHH

-

VTV
13.4%

Utilities

SCHH

-

VTV
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHH vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHH
SCHH Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SCHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHH Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHH Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHH vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHHVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.45

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

4.03

-2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.92

15.20

-10.28

SCHH vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHH Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHH and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHHVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

2.52

-1.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.82

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.75

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.51

-0.17

Drawdowns

SCHH vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHHVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.22%

-59.27%

+15.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-6.35%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

-14.52%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.28%

-17.04%

-16.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.22%

-36.78%

-7.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-1.11%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-7.87%

-1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

1.68%

+0.95%

Volatility

SCHH vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.65%. This indicates that SCHH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHHVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

2.65%

+1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

7.67%

+2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

10.18%

+3.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.72%

13.89%

+4.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.98%

16.68%

+4.30%

SCHH vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHH vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than VTV's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
2.79%3.04%3.22%3.24%2.55%1.50%2.86%2.86%3.64%2.22%2.81%2.48%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.87%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHH and VTV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHH has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to VTV (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHH dropped -44.22% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.42% vs 4.14% for SCHH. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.42% return vs 4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SCHH.

SCHH has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.87% for VTV.

SCHH is categorized as REIT, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SCHH and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHH and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer