PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHH vs. PG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHH vs. PG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHH achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHH has underperformed PG with an annualized return of 4.14%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.64% annualized return.


SCHH

1D
-1.35%
1M
-0.72%
YTD
12.43%
6M
12.55%
1Y
12.92%
3Y*
9.97%
5Y*
2.78%
10Y*
4.14%

PG

1D
-0.98%
1M
-0.90%
YTD
2.74%
6M
6.43%
1Y
-8.99%
3Y*
2.29%
5Y*
4.10%
10Y*
8.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHH vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
12.43%2.20%4.99%11.18%-24.99%41.07%-14.81%22.85%-4.26%3.68%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.74%-12.26%17.25%-0.86%-5.05%20.52%14.15%39.70%3.57%12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHH and PG is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHH vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHH
SCHH Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SCHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHH Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHH Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

PG
PG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHH vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHHPGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.94

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

-0.58

+2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.92

-1.04

+5.96

SCHH vs. PG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHH Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the PG Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHH and PG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHHPGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

-0.48

+1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

0.23

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.46

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.46

-0.12

Drawdowns

SCHH vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, smaller than the maximum PG drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and PG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHHPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.22%

-54.25%

+10.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-15.52%

+7.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

-21.15%

+3.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.28%

-23.77%

-9.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.22%

-23.77%

-20.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-15.91%

+13.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-12.16%

+2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

8.93%

-6.30%

Volatility

SCHH vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) is 4.21%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that SCHH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHHPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

7.01%

-2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

15.32%

-5.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

18.65%

-5.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.72%

17.79%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.98%

19.05%

+1.93%

Dividends

SCHH vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than PG's 2.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.94%2.91%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
2.79%3.04%3.22%3.24%2.55%1.50%2.86%2.86%3.64%2.22%2.81%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHH and PG have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PG has higher volatility (7.01%) compared to SCHH (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHH dropped -44.22% vs PG's -54.25%.

SCHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHH and PG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer