PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHH vs. NVDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHH vs. NVDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHH achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly higher than NVDY's 10.31% return.


SCHH

1D
-1.35%
1M
-0.72%
YTD
12.43%
6M
12.55%
1Y
12.92%
3Y*
9.97%
5Y*
2.78%
10Y*
4.14%

NVDY

1D
1.46%
1M
-2.61%
YTD
10.31%
6M
11.29%
1Y
42.27%
3Y*
53.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHH vs. NVDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
12.43%2.20%4.99%9.51%
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
10.31%27.38%114.23%41.31%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHH and NVDY is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023

0.03

The correlation between SCHH and NVDY shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.03 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHH vs. NVDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHH
SCHH Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SCHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHH Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHH Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDY
NVDY Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NVDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDY Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDY Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHH vs. NVDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHHNVDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.26

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

3.31

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.92

8.03

-3.11

SCHH vs. NVDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHH Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the NVDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHH and NVDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHHNVDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

1.53

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

1.59

-1.25

Drawdowns

SCHH vs. NVDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, which is greater than NVDY's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and NVDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHHNVDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.22%

-34.08%

-10.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-12.81%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

-34.08%

+16.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-8.93%

+6.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-6.16%

-3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

5.28%

-2.65%

Volatility

SCHH vs. NVDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) is 4.21%, while YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF (NVDY) has a volatility of 10.13%. This indicates that SCHH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHHNVDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.21%

10.13%

-5.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

21.34%

-11.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.39%

27.86%

-14.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.72%

38.29%

-19.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.98%

38.29%

-17.31%

SCHH vs. NVDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHH vs. NVDY - Dividend Comparison

SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than NVDY's 64.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDY
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF
64.50%83.10%83.65%22.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
2.79%3.04%3.22%3.24%2.55%1.50%2.86%2.86%3.64%2.22%2.81%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHH and NVDY have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDY has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to SCHH (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHH dropped -44.22% vs NVDY's -34.08%.

On 3-year performance, NVDY leads with 53.70% vs 9.97% for SCHH. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SCHH has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, NVDY has performed better with a 53.70% return vs 9.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDY.

NVDY has the higher dividend yield at 64.50%, compared with 2.79% for SCHH.

SCHH is categorized as REIT, while NVDY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SCHH and 0.99% for NVDY.

NVDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHH and NVDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer