SCHH vs. NLY
SCHH (Schwab US REIT ETF) is REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while NLY (Annaly Capital Management, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SCHH returned 4.14%/yr vs 5.29%/yr for NLY. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SCHH vs. NLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHH achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly higher than NLY's -3.07% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHH has underperformed NLY with an annualized return of 4.14%, while NLY has yielded a comparatively higher 5.29% annualized return.
SCHH
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 12.55%
- 1Y
- 12.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.97%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- 4.14%
NLY
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -7.30%
- YTD
- -3.07%
- 6M
- -1.18%
- 1Y
- 25.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.16%
- 5Y*
- 1.37%
- 10Y*
- 5.29%
SCHH vs. NLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 12.43% | 2.20% | 4.99% | 11.18% | -24.99% | 41.07% | -14.81% | 22.85% | -4.26% | 3.68% |
NLY Annaly Capital Management, Inc. | -3.07% | 40.00% | 8.07% | 4.94% | -21.41% | 2.48% | 2.38% | 7.22% | -7.22% | 31.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHH and NLY is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011 | 0.48 |
The correlation between SCHH and NLY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHH vs. NLY — Risk / Return Rank
SCHH
NLY
SCHH vs. NLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHH | NLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.24 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 1.75 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | 5.22 | -0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHH | NLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 1.40 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.05 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 0.19 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.30 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
SCHH vs. NLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, smaller than the maximum NLY drawdown of -60.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and NLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHH | NLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.22% | -60.09% | +15.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.28% | -14.88% | +6.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.76% | -26.70% | +8.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.28% | -51.97% | +18.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.22% | -60.09% | +15.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -11.17% | +9.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -13.75% | +4.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 4.97% | -2.34% |
Volatility
SCHH vs. NLY - Volatility Comparison
Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) at 3.97%. This indicates that SCHH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHH | NLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 3.97% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.75% | 14.66% | -4.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.39% | 18.56% | -5.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 25.54% | -6.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 28.12% | -7.14% |
Dividends
SCHH vs. NLY - Dividend Comparison
SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than NLY's 13.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLY Annaly Capital Management, Inc. | 13.36% | 12.52% | 14.21% | 13.42% | 16.70% | 11.25% | 10.77% | 11.15% | 12.22% | 10.09% | 12.04% | 12.79% |
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 2.79% | 3.04% | 3.22% | 3.24% | 2.55% | 1.50% | 2.86% | 2.86% | 3.64% | 2.22% | 2.81% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHH and NLY have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHH has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to NLY (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHH dropped -44.22% vs NLY's -60.09%.
NLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHH and NLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer