SCHH vs. IVV
SCHH (Schwab US REIT ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHH is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHH returned 4.14%/yr vs 15.32%/yr for IVV. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHH charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
SCHH vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHH achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 8.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHH has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 4.14%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.
SCHH
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 12.55%
- 1Y
- 12.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.97%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- 4.14%
IVV
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 8.76%
- 1Y
- 24.89%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 15.32%
SCHH vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 12.43% | 2.20% | 4.99% | 11.18% | -24.99% | 41.07% | -14.81% | 22.85% | -4.26% | 3.68% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 8.72% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHH and IVV is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCHH and IVV has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SCHH vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHH
IVV
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
SCHH
IVV
Basic Materials
SCHH
IVV
Financial Services
SCHH
IVV
Communication Services
SCHH
-
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
SCHH
-
IVV
Consumer Defensive
SCHH
-
IVV
Energy
SCHH
-
IVV
Healthcare
SCHH
-
IVV
Industrials
SCHH
-
IVV
Technology
SCHH
-
IVV
Utilities
SCHH
-
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHH vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
SCHH
IVV
SCHH vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHH | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.38 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 2.81 | -1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.92 | 12.97 | -8.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHH | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 2.07 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.80 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 | 0.85 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.45 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
SCHH vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHH | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.22% | -55.25% | +11.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.28% | -8.89% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.76% | -18.75% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.28% | -24.53% | -8.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.22% | -33.90% | -10.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -2.67% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.45% | -10.77% | +1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 1.92% | +0.71% |
Volatility
SCHH vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 3.77%. This indicates that SCHH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHH | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 3.77% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.75% | 9.31% | +0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.39% | 12.08% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 16.92% | +1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 18.07% | +2.91% |
SCHH vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHH vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than IVV's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.09% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 2.79% | 3.04% | 3.22% | 3.24% | 2.55% | 1.50% | 2.86% | 2.86% | 3.64% | 2.22% | 2.81% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHH and IVV have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHH has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to IVV (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHH dropped -44.22% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.32% vs 4.14% for SCHH. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.32% return vs 4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SCHH.
SCHH has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.09% for IVV.
SCHH is categorized as REIT, while IVV is S&P 500. SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SCHH and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHH and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer