SCHG vs. AQMNX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) and AQMNX (AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N) are both funds - SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while AQMNX is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by AQR Funds. SCHG is passively managed, while AQMNX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHG returned 18.53%/yr vs 4.71%/yr for AQMNX. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHG charges 0.04%/yr vs 2.97%/yr for AQMNX.

Performance

SCHG vs. AQMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly lower than AQMNX's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHG has outperformed AQMNX with an annualized return of 18.53%, while AQMNX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.71% annualized return.

SCHG

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -0.94%
• YTD: 3.75%
• 6M: 2.93%
• 1Y: 20.82%
• 3Y*: 24.03%
• 5Y*: 14.90%
• 10Y*: 18.53%

AQMNX

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 1.24%
• YTD: 12.24%
• 6M: 14.33%
• 1Y: 24.98%
• 3Y*: 12.16%
• 5Y*: 12.32%
• 10Y*: 4.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHG vs. AQMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	3.75%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%
AQMNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N	12.24%	14.38%	7.96%	1.79%	35.16%	-1.31%	-0.62%	1.57%	-9.12%	-1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHG and AQMNX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2010	0.05

The correlation between SCHG and AQMNX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (5 years) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SCHG vs. AQMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 36
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 40
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 32

AQMNX

AQMNX Risk / Return Rank: 90
AQMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
AQMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AQMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
AQMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AQMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHG vs. AQMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHG	AQMNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	2.84	-1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	3.85	-2.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.50	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	7.83	-6.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.25	26.39	-22.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHG vs. AQMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the AQMNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHG and AQMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHG	AQMNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.33	2.84	-1.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	1.07	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	0.46	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	0.38	+0.45

Drawdowns

SCHG vs. AQMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, which is greater than AQMNX's maximum drawdown of -27.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and AQMNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHG	AQMNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.59%	-27.50%	-7.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.41%	-3.15%	-13.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.39%	-13.70%	-9.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.59%	-13.70%	-20.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.59%	-24.13%	-10.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.25%	-1.12%	-3.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.20%	-10.39%	+5.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.91%	0.99%	+3.92%

Volatility

SCHG vs. AQMNX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N (AQMNX) at 2.61%. This indicates that SCHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AQMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHG	AQMNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.52%	2.61%	+1.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.02%	6.70%	+5.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.77%	8.69%	+7.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.31%	11.55%	+10.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.58%	10.33%	+11.25%

SCHG vs. AQMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than AQMNX's 2.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHG vs. AQMNX - Dividend Comparison

SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than AQMNX's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AQMNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class N	1.83%	2.05%	3.61%	8.15%	12.59%	6.59%	4.17%	2.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%	6.30%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.37%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHG and AQMNX in my portfolio?

SCHG and AQMNX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHG or AQMNX?

SCHG has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to AQMNX (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs AQMNX's -27.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AQMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.