SCHD vs. XYLD
SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while XYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHD returned 12.65%/yr vs 8.23%/yr for XYLD. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHD charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.
Performance
SCHD vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 4.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has outperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 12.65%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.23% annualized return.
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 18.71%
- 6M
- 19.28%
- 1Y
- 26.37%
- 3Y*
- 14.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
XYLD
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 4.47%
- 6M
- 5.83%
- 1Y
- 16.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- 8.23%
SCHD vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 18.71% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 4.47% | 8.02% | 19.49% | 11.10% | -12.05% | 19.59% | -0.56% | 21.41% | -6.09% | 16.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHD and XYLD is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCHD and XYLD has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SCHD vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHD
XYLD
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Technology
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHD
XYLD
Healthcare
SCHD
XYLD
Technology
SCHD
XYLD
Energy
SCHD
XYLD
Financial Services
SCHD
XYLD
Industrials
SCHD
XYLD
Communication Services
SCHD
XYLD
Consumer Cyclical
SCHD
XYLD
Basic Materials
SCHD
XYLD
Utilities
SCHD
XYLD
Real Estate
SCHD
-
XYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHD vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank
SCHD
XYLD
SCHD vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHD | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.59 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.74 | 3.15 | +2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.06 | 16.73 | -2.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHD | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.53 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.68 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.58 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.60 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
SCHD vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, roughly equal to the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and XYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHD | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -33.46% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -5.29% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -15.53% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -18.66% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | -33.46% | +0.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -0.64% | -1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | -3.72% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 0.99% | +0.89% |
Volatility
SCHD vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a higher volatility of 2.83% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 1.33%. This indicates that SCHD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHD | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 1.33% | +1.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.60% | 5.46% | +2.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 6.60% | +4.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 11.23% | +3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 14.21% | +2.51% |
SCHD vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHD vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than XYLD's 10.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.27% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.57% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHD and XYLD have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to XYLD (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs XYLD's -33.46%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.65% vs 8.23% for XYLD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.65% return vs 8.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.57%, compared with 3.27% for SCHD.
SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while XYLD is Derivative Income. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHD and XYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer