SCHD vs. SILJ
SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHD returned 12.65%/yr vs 8.17%/yr for SILJ. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHD charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SILJ.
Performance
SCHD vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly higher than SILJ's -4.81% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has outperformed SILJ with an annualized return of 12.65%, while SILJ has yielded a comparatively lower 8.17% annualized return.
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 18.71%
- 6M
- 19.28%
- 1Y
- 26.37%
- 3Y*
- 14.73%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
SILJ
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -17.04%
- YTD
- -4.81%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- 1Y
- 79.14%
- 3Y*
- 43.26%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
SCHD vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 18.71% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | -4.81% | 183.89% | 6.39% | -5.21% | -15.42% | -23.21% | 33.00% | 57.06% | -27.95% | -5.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHD and SILJ is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2012 | 0.18 |
The correlation between SCHD and SILJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHD vs. SILJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHD
SILJ
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHD
SILJ
Healthcare
SCHD
SILJ
-
Technology
SCHD
SILJ
-
Energy
SCHD
SILJ
-
Financial Services
SCHD
SILJ
Industrials
SCHD
SILJ
-
Communication Services
SCHD
SILJ
Consumer Cyclical
SCHD
SILJ
-
Basic Materials
SCHD
SILJ
Utilities
SCHD
SILJ
-
Real Estate
SCHD
-
SILJ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHD vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank
SCHD
SILJ
SCHD vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHD | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.26 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.74 | 2.29 | +3.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.06 | 5.48 | +8.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHD | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 1.43 | +1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.25 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.18 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.07 | +0.79 |
Drawdowns
SCHD vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and SILJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHD | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.37% | -79.04% | +45.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -34.71% | +30.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.13% | -34.71% | +18.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.85% | -55.47% | +38.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.37% | -70.06% | +36.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -34.64% | +33.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | -41.42% | +38.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 14.49% | -12.61% |
Volatility
SCHD vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 2.83%, while Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a volatility of 20.06%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHD | SILJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 20.06% | -17.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.60% | 46.73% | -39.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 55.89% | -44.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 44.60% | -30.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 46.33% | -29.61% |
SCHD vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHD vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison
SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than SILJ's 2.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.27% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF | 2.10% | 2.00% | 7.26% | 0.01% | 0.05% | 0.36% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.66% | 0.00% | 0.52% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHD and SILJ have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SILJ has higher volatility (20.06%) compared to SCHD (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs SILJ's -79.04%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.65% vs 8.17% for SILJ. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.65% return vs 8.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 2.10% for SILJ.
SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while SILJ is Silver. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.69% for SILJ.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHD and SILJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer