SCHD vs. QQQY

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) and QQQY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while QQQY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance. SCHD is passively managed, while QQQY is actively managed. Over the past year, SCHD returned 26.37% vs 30.60% for QQQY. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHD charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for QQQY.

Performance

SCHD vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly higher than QQQY's 14.65% return.

SCHD

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 2.12%
• YTD: 18.71%
• 6M: 19.28%
• 1Y: 26.37%
• 3Y*: 14.73%
• 5Y*: 8.49%
• 10Y*: 12.65%

QQQY

• 1D: 1.28%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: 14.65%
• 6M: 14.20%
• 1Y: 30.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHD vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	18.71%	4.34%	11.66%	5.51%
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF	14.65%	14.96%	7.70%	7.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and QQQY is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023	0.32

The correlation between SCHD and QQQY shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

SCHD vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD

SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 85
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 80

QQQY

QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 68
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHD vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHD	QQQY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	2.12	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.75	2.62	+1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.40	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.74	2.76	+2.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.06	11.59	+2.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHD vs. QQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the QQQY Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and QQQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHD	QQQY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.43	2.12	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	1.11	-0.26

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, which is greater than QQQY's maximum drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and QQQY.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHD	QQQY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.37%	-19.05%	-14.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.61%	-11.14%	+6.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.85%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.64%	-4.06%	+2.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.32%	-2.91%	-0.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	2.65%	-0.77%

Volatility

SCHD vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 2.83%, while Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) has a volatility of 6.53%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHD	QQQY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.83%	6.53%	-3.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.60%	12.41%	-4.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.94%	14.55%	-3.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.38%	15.03%	-0.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.72%	15.03%	+1.69%

SCHD vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHD vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, less than QQQY's 35.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF	35.66%	45.34%	83.34%	20.64%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	3.27%	3.82%	3.64%	3.49%	3.39%	2.78%	3.16%	2.98%	3.06%	2.63%	2.89%	2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHD and QQQY in my portfolio?

SCHD and QQQY have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHD or QQQY?

QQQY has higher volatility (6.53%) compared to SCHD (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs QQQY's -19.05%.

Which ETF is better, SCHD or QQQY?

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 30.60% vs 26.37% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHD or QQQY?

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 30.60% return vs 26.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHD or QQQY?

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for QQQY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHD or QQQY?

QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 35.66%, compared with 3.27% for SCHD.

What is the main difference between SCHD and QQQY?

SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.99% for QQQY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.