PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHD vs. IWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHD vs. IWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly higher than IWR's 10.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has outperformed IWR with an annualized return of 12.65%, while IWR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.41% annualized return.


SCHD

1D
-0.03%
1M
2.12%
YTD
18.71%
6M
19.28%
1Y
26.37%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
12.65%

IWR

1D
0.08%
1M
1.05%
YTD
10.71%
6M
10.50%
1Y
19.23%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
7.68%
10Y*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHD vs. IWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
18.71%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
10.71%10.37%15.21%17.05%-17.48%22.44%16.93%30.23%-9.10%18.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and IWR is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between SCHD and IWR has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SCHD vs. IWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHD
IWR

Consumer Defensive

19.2%
4.1%

Healthcare

18.8%
8.7%

Technology

16.4%
17.2%

Energy

16.2%
7.2%

Financial Services

9.3%
12.5%

Industrials

7.5%
18.4%

Communication Services

6.3%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
11.2%

Basic Materials

1.2%
4.3%

Utilities

0.0%
6.1%

Real Estate

-

7.0%

Consumer Defensive

SCHD
19.2%
IWR
4.1%

Healthcare

SCHD
18.8%
IWR
8.7%

Technology

SCHD
16.4%
IWR
17.2%

Energy

SCHD
16.2%
IWR
7.2%

Financial Services

SCHD
9.3%
IWR
12.5%

Industrials

SCHD
7.5%
IWR
18.4%

Communication Services

SCHD
6.3%
IWR
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHD
6.3%
IWR
11.2%

Basic Materials

SCHD
1.2%
IWR
4.3%

Utilities

SCHD
0.0%
IWR
6.1%

Real Estate

SCHD

-

IWR
7.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHD vs. IWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

IWR
IWR Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
IWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWR Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
IWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWR Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHD vs. IWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHDIWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.25

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.74

2.37

+3.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.06

9.09

+4.97

SCHD vs. IWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the IWR Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and IWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHDIWRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

1.43

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.42

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.59

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.49

+0.37

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. IWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum IWR drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and IWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHDIWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-58.78%

+25.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-8.17%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-21.09%

+4.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

-26.18%

+9.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

-40.59%

+7.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-2.04%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-7.80%

+4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.12%

-0.24%

Volatility

SCHD vs. IWR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 2.83%, while iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHDIWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

3.59%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

10.06%

-2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.94%

13.54%

-2.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

18.25%

-3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

19.38%

-2.66%

SCHD vs. IWR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IWR's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHD vs. IWR - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than IWR's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
1.17%1.29%1.27%1.43%1.59%1.04%1.28%1.43%1.98%1.52%1.72%1.59%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.27%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHD and IWR have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWR has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to SCHD (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs IWR's -58.78%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.65% vs 11.41% for IWR. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.65% return vs 11.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWR.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.17% for IWR.

SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while IWR is Mid Cap Growth Equities. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while IWR tracks Russell Midcap Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.19% for IWR.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHD and IWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer