PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHC vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHC vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHC achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 10.82% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHC has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 7.91%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.70% annualized return.


SCHC

1D
0.04%
1M
-5.20%
YTD
6.81%
6M
9.38%
1Y
23.23%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
7.91%

VYM

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.71%
YTD
10.82%
6M
10.58%
1Y
24.30%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
11.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHC vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
6.81%37.59%1.97%14.36%-21.74%12.02%10.48%23.10%-18.60%29.42%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
10.82%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHC and VYM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2010

0.74

The correlation between SCHC and VYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHC vs. VYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHC
VYM

Industrials

22.4%
12.1%

Basic Materials

13.7%
3.5%

Financial Services

12.6%
20.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
6.7%

Technology

9.2%
17.7%

Real Estate

8.6%
0.0%

Energy

6.5%
9.8%

Healthcare

6.5%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
8.1%

Communication Services

3.2%
3.5%

Utilities

3.2%
5.7%

Industrials

SCHC
22.4%
VYM
12.1%

Basic Materials

SCHC
13.7%
VYM
3.5%

Financial Services

SCHC
12.6%
VYM
20.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHC
10.0%
VYM
6.7%

Technology

SCHC
9.2%
VYM
17.7%

Real Estate

SCHC
8.6%
VYM
0.0%

Energy

SCHC
6.5%
VYM
9.8%

Healthcare

SCHC
6.5%
VYM
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

SCHC
4.1%
VYM
8.1%

Communication Services

SCHC
3.2%
VYM
3.5%

Utilities

SCHC
3.2%
VYM
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHC vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHC
SCHC Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SCHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHC Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHC vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHCVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.43

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

3.65

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.03

13.64

-6.62

SCHC vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHC Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHC and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHCVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

2.36

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.81

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.72

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.50

-0.12

Drawdowns

SCHC vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHC drawdown since its inception was -43.94%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHC and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHCVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.94%

-56.98%

+13.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-6.69%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.52%

-14.46%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.48%

-15.84%

-20.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.94%

-35.21%

-8.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.65%

-1.89%

-3.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-7.19%

-2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

1.79%

+1.52%

Volatility

SCHC vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) at 2.82%. This indicates that SCHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHCVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.47%

2.82%

+2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.49%

7.73%

+5.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

10.35%

+5.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.56%

13.98%

+3.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

16.35%

+1.67%

SCHC vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHC has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHC vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than VYM's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
3.43%3.66%3.72%2.94%1.78%3.02%1.62%3.23%2.51%2.73%2.01%2.34%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.22%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHC and VYM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHC has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to VYM (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHC dropped -43.94% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.70% vs 7.91% for SCHC. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.70% return vs 7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for SCHC.

SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 2.22% for VYM.

SCHC is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while VYM is Dividend. SCHC tracks FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux), while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SCHC and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHC and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer