PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHB vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHB vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHB achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHB has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 14.83%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.50% annualized return.


SCHB

1D
0.35%
1M
0.46%
YTD
9.14%
6M
9.03%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
21.09%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*
14.83%

XMMO

1D
0.46%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
19.66%
6M
19.51%
1Y
31.14%
3Y*
29.91%
5Y*
15.72%
10Y*
19.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHB vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
9.14%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%30.79%-5.43%21.20%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
19.66%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHB and XMMO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009

0.85

The correlation between SCHB and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHB vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHB
XMMO

Technology

34.4%
16.7%

Financial Services

12.2%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
4.6%

Communication Services

10.1%
1.6%

Industrials

9.4%
41.1%

Healthcare

8.9%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
0.5%

Energy

3.7%
7.7%

Real Estate

2.4%
6.1%

Utilities

2.3%
5.8%

Basic Materials

2.0%
7.2%

Technology

SCHB
34.4%
XMMO
16.7%

Financial Services

SCHB
12.2%
XMMO
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHB
10.1%
XMMO
4.6%

Communication Services

SCHB
10.1%
XMMO
1.6%

Industrials

SCHB
9.4%
XMMO
41.1%

Healthcare

SCHB
8.9%
XMMO
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

SCHB
4.6%
XMMO
0.5%

Energy

SCHB
3.7%
XMMO
7.7%

Real Estate

SCHB
2.4%
XMMO
6.1%

Utilities

SCHB
2.3%
XMMO
5.8%

Basic Materials

SCHB
2.0%
XMMO
7.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHB vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHB vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHBXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.29

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

3.75

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.80

15.23

-2.43

SCHB vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHB Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHB and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHBXMMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.63

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.73

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.88

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.57

+0.26

Drawdowns

SCHB vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHB drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHB and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHBXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.27%

-55.37%

+20.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-8.34%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.34%

-24.93%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

-27.91%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

-36.74%

+1.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-3.69%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-9.45%

+5.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.07%

-0.12%

Volatility

SCHB vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) is 3.93%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that SCHB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHBXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.93%

7.70%

-3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.57%

16.07%

-6.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.41%

19.18%

-6.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.28%

21.52%

-4.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.34%

22.31%

-3.97%

SCHB vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHB vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

SCHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than XMMO's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.04%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.62%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHB and XMMO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to SCHB (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHB dropped -35.27% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.50% vs 14.83% for SCHB. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHB has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.50% return vs 14.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.62% for XMMO.

SCHB is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XMMO is Momentum. SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHB and 0.35% for XMMO.

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHB and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer