SCHB vs. IWR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) and IWR (iShares Russell Midcap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHB is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index, while IWR is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHB returned 14.83%/yr vs 11.41%/yr for IWR. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWR.

Performance

SCHB vs. IWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHB achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than IWR's 10.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHB has outperformed IWR with an annualized return of 14.83%, while IWR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.41% annualized return.

SCHB

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 9.14%
• 6M: 9.03%
• 1Y: 24.95%
• 3Y*: 21.09%
• 5Y*: 12.31%
• 10Y*: 14.83%

IWR

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 1.05%
• YTD: 10.71%
• 6M: 10.50%
• 1Y: 19.23%
• 3Y*: 16.25%
• 5Y*: 7.68%
• 10Y*: 11.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHB vs. IWR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF	9.14%	16.94%	23.93%	26.16%	-19.46%	25.84%	20.76%	30.79%	-5.43%	21.20%
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF	10.71%	10.37%	15.21%	17.05%	-17.48%	22.44%	16.93%	30.23%	-9.10%	18.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHB and IWR is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009	0.95

The correlation between SCHB and IWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.95 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHB vs. IWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHB	IWR
Technology	34.4%	17.2%
Financial Services	12.2%	12.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	11.2%
Communication Services	10.1%	3.4%
Industrials	9.4%	18.4%
Healthcare	8.9%	8.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	4.1%
Energy	3.7%	7.2%
Real Estate	2.4%	7.0%
Utilities	2.3%	6.1%
Basic Materials	2.0%	4.3%

Return for Risk

SCHB vs. IWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHB

SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 68
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 68
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 75

IWR

IWR Risk / Return Rank: 49
IWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
IWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
IWR Omega Ratio Rank: 43
IWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
IWR Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHB vs. IWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHB	IWR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.43	+0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	2.07	+0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.25	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	2.37	+0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.80	9.09	+3.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHB vs. IWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHB Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the IWR Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHB and IWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHB	IWR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	1.43	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.42	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.59	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.49	+0.33

Drawdowns

SCHB vs. IWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHB drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, smaller than the maximum IWR drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHB and IWR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHB	IWR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.27%	-58.78%	+23.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.91%	-8.17%	-0.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.34%	-21.09%	+1.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.41%	-26.18%	+0.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.27%	-40.59%	+5.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.63%	-2.04%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.11%	-7.80%	+3.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	2.12%	-0.17%

Volatility

SCHB vs. IWR - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) at 3.59%. This indicates that SCHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHB	IWR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	3.59%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.57%	10.06%	-0.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.41%	13.54%	-1.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.28%	18.25%	-0.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.34%	19.38%	-1.04%

SCHB vs. IWR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IWR's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCHB vs. IWR - Dividend Comparison

SCHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than IWR's 1.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWR iShares Russell Midcap ETF	1.17%	1.29%	1.27%	1.43%	1.59%	1.04%	1.28%	1.43%	1.98%	1.52%	1.72%	1.59%
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF	1.04%	1.11%	1.24%	1.40%	1.61%	1.21%	1.63%	1.80%	2.00%	1.65%	1.86%	2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHB and IWR in my portfolio?

SCHB and IWR have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHB or IWR?

SCHB has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to IWR (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHB dropped -35.27% vs IWR's -58.78%.

Which ETF is better, SCHB or IWR?

On 10-year performance, SCHB leads with 14.83% vs 11.41% for IWR. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IWR has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHB or IWR?

Over the 10-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 14.83% return vs 11.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHB or IWR?

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHB or IWR?

IWR has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 1.04% for SCHB.

What is the main difference between SCHB and IWR?

SCHB is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IWR is Mid Cap Growth Equities. SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index, while IWR tracks Russell Midcap Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHB and 0.19% for IWR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.