SCHB vs. IWB
SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) and IWB (iShares Russell 1000 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - SCHB tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index while IWB tracks the Russell 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHB returned 14.83%/yr vs 14.97%/yr for IWB. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SCHB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IWB.
Performance
SCHB vs. IWB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHB achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly higher than IWB's 8.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHB having a 14.83% annualized return and IWB not far ahead at 14.97%.
SCHB
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 24.95%
- 3Y*
- 21.09%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
IWB
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- 23.94%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 14.97%
SCHB vs. IWB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 9.14% | 16.94% | 23.93% | 26.16% | -19.46% | 25.84% | 20.76% | 30.79% | -5.43% | 21.20% |
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 8.46% | 17.18% | 24.32% | 26.39% | -19.19% | 26.32% | 20.77% | 31.06% | -4.90% | 21.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHB and IWB is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2009 | 0.99 |
The correlation between SCHB and IWB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHB vs. IWB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHB
IWB
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
SCHB
IWB
Financial Services
SCHB
IWB
Consumer Cyclical
SCHB
IWB
Communication Services
SCHB
IWB
Industrials
SCHB
IWB
Healthcare
SCHB
IWB
Consumer Defensive
SCHB
IWB
Energy
SCHB
IWB
Real Estate
SCHB
IWB
Utilities
SCHB
IWB
Basic Materials
SCHB
IWB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHB vs. IWB — Risk / Return Rank
SCHB
IWB
SCHB vs. IWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) and iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHB | IWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.36 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 2.71 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.80 | 12.38 | +0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHB | IWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 1.98 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.74 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.83 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.45 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
SCHB vs. IWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHB drawdown since its inception was -35.27%, smaller than the maximum IWB drawdown of -55.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHB and IWB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHB | IWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.27% | -55.38% | +20.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -8.86% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.34% | -19.09% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.41% | -25.20% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.27% | -34.60% | -0.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.63% | -2.58% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -10.85% | +6.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 1.94% | +0.01% |
Volatility
SCHB vs. IWB - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) at 3.74%. This indicates that SCHB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHB | IWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 3.74% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.57% | 9.37% | +0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.41% | 12.20% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 17.14% | +0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 18.16% | +0.18% |
SCHB vs. IWB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IWB's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHB vs. IWB - Dividend Comparison
SCHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than IWB's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWB iShares Russell 1000 ETF | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.14% | 1.31% | 1.56% | 1.09% | 1.37% | 1.71% | 2.06% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 1.95% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, SCHB and IWB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHB has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to IWB (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHB dropped -35.27% vs IWB's -55.38%.
On 10-year performance, IWB leads with 14.97% vs 14.83% for SCHB. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IWB has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWB has performed better with a 14.97% return vs 14.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IWB.
SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.93% for IWB.
SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index, while IWB tracks Russell 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHB and 0.15% for IWB.
SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHB and IWB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer