SCCO vs. ENVA
SCCO (Southern Copper Corporation) and ENVA (Enova International, Inc.) are both stocks. SCCO operates in Copper (Basic Materials), while ENVA operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, SCCO returned 25.95%/yr vs 36.71%/yr for ENVA. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SCCO vs. ENVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCCO achieves a 22.20% return, which is significantly higher than ENVA's 9.12% return. Over the past 10 years, SCCO has underperformed ENVA with an annualized return of 25.95%, while ENVA has yielded a comparatively higher 36.71% annualized return.
SCCO
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -6.59%
- YTD
- 22.20%
- 6M
- 24.30%
- 1Y
- 89.39%
- 3Y*
- 40.28%
- 5Y*
- 27.20%
- 10Y*
- 25.95%
ENVA
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 9.12%
- 6M
- 26.22%
- 1Y
- 77.69%
- 3Y*
- 49.36%
- 5Y*
- 36.19%
- 10Y*
- 36.71%
SCCO vs. ENVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | 22.20% | 66.62% | 9.45% | 50.12% | 4.25% | -0.62% | 58.79% | 46.59% | -33.11% | 50.79% |
ENVA Enova International, Inc. | 9.12% | 63.95% | 73.19% | 44.28% | -6.32% | 65.36% | 2.95% | 23.64% | 28.03% | 21.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCCO and ENVA is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2014 | 0.31 |
The correlation between SCCO and ENVA shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SCCO:
$140.08B
ENVA:
$4.52B
SCCO:
$6.04
ENVA:
$12.29
SCCO:
28.24
ENVA:
13.95
SCCO:
3.89
ENVA:
0.76
SCCO:
9.64
ENVA:
1.39
SCCO:
11.88
ENVA:
3.22
SCCO:
$14.55B
ENVA:
$3.28B
SCCO:
$6.04B
ENVA:
$1.23B
SCCO:
$8.80B
ENVA:
$456.13M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCCO vs. ENVA — Risk / Return Rank
SCCO
ENVA
SCCO vs. ENVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) and Enova International, Inc. (ENVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCCO | ENVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 3.16 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.65 | 8.14 | +0.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCCO | ENVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 2.06 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.90 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.75 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.34 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
SCCO vs. ENVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCCO drawdown since its inception was -78.60%, roughly equal to the maximum ENVA drawdown of -81.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCCO and ENVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCCO | ENVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.60% | -81.56% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.22% | -24.75% | -5.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.69% | -37.01% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.07% | -42.84% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.83% | -77.57% | +22.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.91% | -1.92% | -18.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.05% | -29.60% | +7.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.36% | 9.57% | +0.79% |
Volatility
SCCO vs. ENVA - Volatility Comparison
Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) has a higher volatility of 17.80% compared to Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) at 10.45%. This indicates that SCCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCCO | ENVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.80% | 10.45% | +7.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.41% | 28.16% | +12.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.68% | 38.08% | +10.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.72% | 40.29% | -0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.41% | 49.22% | -11.81% |
Dividends
SCCO vs. ENVA - Dividend Comparison
SCCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, while ENVA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENVA Enova International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCCO Southern Copper Corporation | 2.14% | 2.13% | 2.29% | 4.65% | 5.80% | 5.19% | 2.30% | 4.81% | 4.55% | 1.24% | 0.56% | 1.30% |
Financials
SCCO vs. ENVA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Southern Copper Corporation and Enova International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SCCO vs. ENVA - Profitability Comparison
SCCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ENVA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 875.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SCCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported an operating income of 2.48B and revenue of 4.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.3%.
ENVA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported an operating income of 207.11M and revenue of 875.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.7%.
SCCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Southern Copper Corporation reported a net income of 1.58B and revenue of 4.25B, resulting in a net margin of 37.1%.
ENVA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported a net income of 91.10M and revenue of 875.14M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SCCO and ENVA have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCCO has higher volatility (17.80%) compared to ENVA (10.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCCO dropped -78.60% vs ENVA's -81.56%.
ENVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCCO and ENVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer