SAF.PA vs. RR.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SAF.PA (Safran SA) and RR.L (Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC) are both stocks. Both operate in the Aerospace & Defense industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, SAF.PA returned 18.41%/yr vs 19.37%/yr for RR.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

SAF.PA vs. RR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Safran SA (SAF.PA) and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SAF.PA is traded in EUR, while RR.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the RR.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAF.PA achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly lower than RR.L's 11.16% return. Over the past 10 years, SAF.PA has underperformed RR.L with an annualized return of 18.41%, while RR.L has yielded a comparatively higher 19.37% annualized return.

SAF.PA

• 1D: 2.21%
• 1M: 6.07%
• YTD: 2.11%
• 6M: 2.94%
• 1Y: 14.29%
• 3Y*: 31.24%
• 5Y*: 20.77%
• 10Y*: 18.41%

RR.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 3.36%
• YTD: 11.16%
• 6M: 15.56%
• 1Y: 39.96%
• 3Y*: 104.02%
• 5Y*: 62.60%
• 10Y*: 19.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAF.PA vs. RR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SAF.PA Safran SA	2.11%	41.80%	34.36%	37.72%	9.15%	-6.83%	-15.76%	32.58%	24.67%	26.88%
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC	11.00%	94.10%	98.88%	228.38%	-28.06%	17.64%	-55.13%	-11.21%	-1.85%	22.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SAF.PA and RR.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007	0.53

Over the past year, SAF.PA and RR.L have become more correlated (0.77) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

SAF.PA vs. RR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAF.PA

SAF.PA Risk / Return Rank: 55
SAF.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
SAF.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
SAF.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SAF.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
SAF.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 58

RR.L

RR.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
RR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
RR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
RR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
RR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAF.PA vs. RR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Safran SA (SAF.PA) and Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SAF.PA	RR.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.45	1.09	-0.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.91	1.76	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.21	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	2.12	-1.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.65	5.83	-4.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SAF.PA vs. RR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAF.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the RR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAF.PA and RR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SAF.PA	RR.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45	1.09	-0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	1.47	-0.75
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.39	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.24	+0.14

Drawdowns

SAF.PA vs. RR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAF.PA drawdown since its inception was -92.64%, roughly equal to the maximum RR.L drawdown of -91.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAF.PA and RR.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SAF.PA	RR.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.64%	-91.10%	-1.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.62%	-18.74%	-4.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.62%	-23.57%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.84%	-56.76%	+26.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.63%	-89.60%	+24.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.54%	-6.52%	-6.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.06%	-31.91%	-4.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.66%	6.84%	+1.82%

Volatility

SAF.PA vs. RR.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Safran SA (SAF.PA) is 10.04%, while Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) has a volatility of 11.81%. This indicates that SAF.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SAF.PA	RR.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.04%	11.81%	-1.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.58%	31.23%	-3.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.29%	36.54%	-5.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.32%	42.64%	-14.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.13%	49.47%	-16.34%

Dividends

SAF.PA vs. RR.L - Dividend Comparison

SAF.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than RR.L's 0.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC	0.75%	0.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.71%	1.41%	0.54%	1.75%	4.06%
SAF.PA Safran SA	1.12%	0.98%	1.04%	0.85%	0.43%	0.40%	0.00%	1.32%	1.53%	0.97%	2.15%	1.96%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SAF.PA and RR.L in my portfolio?

SAF.PA and RR.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.