PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAF.PA vs. HYMC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SAF.PA vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Safran SA (SAF.PA) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SAF.PA is traded in EUR, while HYMC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HYMC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAF.PA achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly lower than HYMC's 12.81% return.


SAF.PA

1D
2.21%
1M
6.07%
YTD
2.11%
6M
3.68%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
31.24%
5Y*
20.77%
10Y*
18.41%

HYMC

1D
-0.49%
1M
-30.01%
YTD
12.81%
6M
135.51%
1Y
499.28%
3Y*
97.13%
5Y*
-5.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAF.PA vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SAF.PA
Safran SA
2.11%41.80%34.36%37.72%9.15%-6.83%-15.76%32.58%20.83%
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
12.81%847.93%-3.84%-55.34%-7.92%-91.60%-30.29%6.74%11.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SAF.PA and HYMC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2018

0.05

The correlation between SAF.PA and HYMC shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAF.PA vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAF.PA
SAF.PA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SAF.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAF.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAF.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SAF.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAF.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

HYMC
HYMC Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
HYMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMC Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMC Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAF.PA vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Safran SA (SAF.PA) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAF.PAHYMCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.46

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

9.66

-9.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.65

22.33

-20.68

SAF.PA vs. HYMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAF.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is lower than the HYMC Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAF.PA and HYMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAF.PAHYMCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

4.27

-3.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

-0.03

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

-0.11

+0.50

Drawdowns

SAF.PA vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAF.PA drawdown since its inception was -92.64%, smaller than the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAF.PA and HYMC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAF.PAHYMCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.64%

-98.79%

+6.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.62%

-52.12%

+28.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.62%

-62.75%

+39.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.84%

-94.64%

+64.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.54%

-82.86%

+70.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.06%

-63.41%

+27.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.66%

22.51%

-13.85%

Volatility

SAF.PA vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Safran SA (SAF.PA) is 10.04%, while Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a volatility of 25.36%. This indicates that SAF.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAF.PAHYMCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.04%

25.36%

-15.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.58%

93.08%

-65.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.29%

118.10%

-86.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.32%

151.65%

-123.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.13%

122.33%

-89.20%

Dividends

SAF.PA vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison

SAF.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while HYMC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SAF.PA
Safran SA
1.12%0.98%1.04%0.85%0.43%0.40%0.00%1.32%1.53%0.97%2.15%1.96%

Financials

SAF.PA vs. HYMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Safran SA and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. SAF.PA values in EUR, HYMC values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


SAF.PA and HYMC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAF.PA and HYMC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer