PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SAABY vs. QQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SAABY vs. QQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saab AB (publ) (SAABY) and QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SAABY is traded in USD, while QQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the QQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SAABY achieves a -3.10% return, which is significantly lower than QQ.L's 7.41% return.


SAABY

1D
1.56%
1M
-4.17%
YTD
-3.10%
6M
4.44%
1Y
6.53%
3Y*
60.83%
5Y*
51.19%
10Y*

QQ.L

1D
1.12%
1M
10.48%
YTD
7.41%
6M
13.69%
1Y
-13.24%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
7.28%
10Y*
8.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SAABY vs. QQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SAABY
Saab AB (publ)
-3.10%177.56%39.85%47.07%67.28%-48.79%82.51%
QQ.L
QinetiQ Group plc
7.41%16.51%34.93%-6.83%22.49%-15.85%4.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SAABY and QQ.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2020

0.28

Over the past year, SAABY and QQ.L have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SAABY:

$30.33B

QQ.L:

£2.48B

EPS

SAABY:

$5.98

QQ.L:

-£0.14

PS Ratio

SAABY:

0.37

QQ.L:

0.67

PB Ratio

SAABY:

0.68

QQ.L:

4.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

SAABY:

$82.29B

QQ.L:

£3.85B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SAABY:

$17.87B

QQ.L:

£372.10M

EBITDA (TTM)

SAABY:

$9.44B

QQ.L:

£533.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SAABY vs. QQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAABY
SAABY Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SAABY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAABY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAABY Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SAABY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAABY Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

QQ.L
QQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
QQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SAABY vs. QQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saab AB (publ) (SAABY) and QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SAABYQQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.96

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

-0.49

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.45

-0.95

+1.40

SAABY vs. QQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SAABY Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is higher than the QQ.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SAABY and QQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SAABYQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

-0.40

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

0.22

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.16

+0.61

Drawdowns

SAABY vs. QQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SAABY drawdown since its inception was -52.75%, smaller than the maximum QQ.L drawdown of -61.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SAABY and QQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SAABYQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.75%

-61.16%

+8.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.04%

-27.17%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.04%

-32.62%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.04%

-33.81%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.86%

-16.77%

-14.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.93%

-20.64%

+3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.58%

13.11%

+1.47%

Volatility

SAABY vs. QQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Saab AB (publ) (SAABY) has a higher volatility of 15.81% compared to QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) at 12.12%. This indicates that SAABY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SAABYQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.81%

12.12%

+3.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.83%

23.27%

+9.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.42%

32.69%

+16.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.99%

32.44%

+14.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

57.54%

31.02%

+26.52%

Dividends

SAABY vs. QQ.L - Dividend Comparison

SAABY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than QQ.L's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQ.L
QinetiQ Group plc
1.90%2.00%1.99%2.49%2.04%2.59%2.06%1.84%2.20%2.60%2.17%1.99%
SAABY
Saab AB (publ)
0.42%0.36%0.73%0.84%1.24%2.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SAABY vs. QQ.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Saab AB (publ) and QinetiQ Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
19.16B
1.02B
(SAABY) Total Revenue
(QQ.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. SAABY values in USD, QQ.L values in GBp

SAABY vs. QQ.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Saab AB (publ) and QinetiQ Group plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%20222023202420252026
23.4%
10.8%
Portfolio components
SAABY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported a gross profit of 4.48B and revenue of 19.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.

QQ.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported a gross profit of 110.20M and revenue of 1.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.

SAABY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported an operating income of 1.91B and revenue of 19.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

QQ.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported an operating income of 110.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.8%.

SAABY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saab AB (publ) reported a net income of 1.44B and revenue of 19.16B, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.

QQ.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported a net income of 69.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SAABY and QQ.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SAABY and QQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer