RZLV vs. CB

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

RZLV (Rezolve AI Ltd) and CB (Chubb Limited) are both stocks. RZLV operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while CB operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past year, RZLV returned 14.71% vs 10.97% for CB. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

RZLV vs. CB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rezolve AI Ltd (RZLV) and Chubb Limited (CB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RZLV achieves a -8.95% return, which is significantly lower than CB's 3.43% return.

RZLV

• 1D: 1.74%
• 1M: -2.50%
• YTD: -8.95%
• 6M: -14.91%
• 1Y: 14.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CB

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 3.43%
• 6M: 8.96%
• 1Y: 10.97%
• 3Y*: 20.64%
• 5Y*: 15.72%
• 10Y*: 11.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RZLV vs. CB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RZLV Rezolve AI Ltd	-8.95%	-32.72%	-64.95%
CB Chubb Limited	3.43%	14.46%	2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between RZLV and CB is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2024	-0.09

Fundamentals

EPS RZLV : -$0.59 CB : $28.35
PS Ratio RZLV : 85.24 CB : 2.67
Total Revenue (TTM) RZLV : $6.41M CB : $48.15B
Gross Profit (TTM) RZLV : $6.12M CB : $17.01B
EBITDA (TTM) RZLV : -$99.67M CB : $12.22B

Return for Risk

RZLV vs. CB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RZLV

RZLV Risk / Return Rank: 51
RZLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
RZLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
RZLV Omega Ratio Rank: 55
RZLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
RZLV Martin Ratio Rank: 46

CB

CB Risk / Return Rank: 61
CB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
CB Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
CB Omega Ratio Rank: 54
CB Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CB Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RZLV vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rezolve AI Ltd (RZLV) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RZLV	CB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.13	0.62	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.17	1.03	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.12	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	1.18	-0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.29	2.70	-2.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RZLV vs. CB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RZLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the CB Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RZLV and CB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RZLV	CB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13	0.62	-0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.39	0.40	-0.79

Drawdowns

RZLV vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RZLV drawdown since its inception was -89.04%, which is greater than CB's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZLV and CB.

Drawdown Indicators

	RZLV	CB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.04%	-50.99%	-38.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.15%	-9.36%	-62.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.26%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.30%	-5.81%	-71.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.88%	-10.68%	-56.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	50.66%	4.52%	+46.14%

Volatility

RZLV vs. CB - Volatility Comparison

Rezolve AI Ltd (RZLV) has a higher volatility of 25.15% compared to Chubb Limited (CB) at 6.11%. This indicates that RZLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RZLV	CB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.15%	6.11%	+19.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	81.08%	13.14%	+67.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	117.13%	17.69%	+99.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	144.67%	20.34%	+124.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	144.67%	23.69%	+120.98%

Dividends

RZLV vs. CB - Dividend Comparison

RZLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CB Chubb Limited	1.21%	1.22%	1.30%	1.51%	1.49%	1.65%	2.01%	1.91%	2.24%	1.93%	2.07%	4.23%
RZLV Rezolve AI Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RZLV and CB in my portfolio?

RZLV and CB have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RZLV or CB?

RZLV has higher volatility (25.15%) compared to CB (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RZLV dropped -89.04% vs CB's -50.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.