RZLV vs. ASML
RZLV (Rezolve AI Ltd) and ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — RZLV in Software - Infrastructure, ASML in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials. Over the past year, RZLV returned 14.71% vs 134.10% for ASML. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RZLV vs. ASML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RZLV achieves a -8.95% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 64.06% return.
RZLV
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- YTD
- -8.95%
- 6M
- -14.91%
- 1Y
- 14.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASML
- 1D
- 6.54%
- 1M
- 9.86%
- YTD
- 64.06%
- 6M
- 56.76%
- 1Y
- 134.10%
- 3Y*
- 36.05%
- 5Y*
- 21.93%
- 10Y*
- 34.75%
RZLV vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RZLV Rezolve AI Ltd | -8.95% | -32.72% | -64.95% |
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 64.06% | 56.51% | -25.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between RZLV and ASML is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2024 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
RZLV:
-$0.59
ASML:
$25.86
RZLV:
85.24
ASML:
20.10
RZLV:
$6.41M
ASML:
$33.69B
RZLV:
$6.12M
ASML:
$17.72B
RZLV:
-$99.67M
ASML:
$12.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RZLV vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank
RZLV
ASML
RZLV vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rezolve AI Ltd (RZLV) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RZLV | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.45 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.20 | 7.56 | -7.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.29 | 20.33 | -20.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RZLV | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 | 3.24 | -3.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.39 | 0.56 | -0.94 |
Drawdowns
RZLV vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RZLV drawdown since its inception was -89.04%, roughly equal to the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RZLV and ASML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RZLV | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.04% | -90.00% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.15% | -17.85% | -54.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -45.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.30% | -0.48% | -76.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.88% | -28.14% | -38.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.66% | 6.62% | +44.04% |
Volatility
RZLV vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison
Rezolve AI Ltd (RZLV) has a higher volatility of 25.15% compared to ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) at 15.94%. This indicates that RZLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RZLV | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.15% | 15.94% | +9.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 81.08% | 33.30% | +47.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 117.13% | 41.73% | +75.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 144.67% | 42.23% | +102.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 144.67% | 38.62% | +106.05% |
Dividends
RZLV vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison
RZLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 0.50% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 0.86% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 1.40% | 0.94% | 0.64% | 0.92% | 0.73% |
RZLV Rezolve AI Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RZLV vs. ASML - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rezolve AI Ltd and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RZLV and ASML have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RZLV has higher volatility (25.15%) compared to ASML (15.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RZLV dropped -89.04% vs ASML's -90.00%.
ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RZLV and ASML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer