PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYCEY vs. IESC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RYCEY vs. IESC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYCEY achieves a 6.89% return, which is significantly lower than IESC's 88.91% return. Over the past 10 years, RYCEY has underperformed IESC with an annualized return of 7.82%, while IESC has yielded a comparatively higher 48.95% annualized return.


RYCEY

1D
-0.24%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
6.89%
6M
11.28%
1Y
38.97%
3Y*
110.24%
5Y*
60.04%
10Y*
7.82%

IESC

1D
1.97%
1M
10.23%
YTD
88.91%
6M
66.06%
1Y
162.49%
3Y*
140.27%
5Y*
69.06%
10Y*
48.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RYCEY vs. IESC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
6.89%123.64%88.21%253.27%-33.95%2.53%-82.05%-12.69%-7.35%40.70%
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
88.91%93.58%153.67%122.72%-29.76%9.99%79.42%65.02%-9.86%-9.92%

Correlation

The correlation between RYCEY and IESC is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2014

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RYCEY:

$140.58B

IESC:

$14.83B

EPS

RYCEY:

$0.99

IESC:

$18.85

PE Ratio

RYCEY:

16.89

IESC:

38.98

PEG Ratio

RYCEY:

0.03

IESC:

0.47

PS Ratio

RYCEY:

3.52

IESC:

4.08

PB Ratio

RYCEY:

51.66

IESC:

13.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

RYCEY:

$40.04B

IESC:

$3.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RYCEY:

$10.10B

IESC:

$931.31M

EBITDA (TTM)

RYCEY:

$8.04B

IESC:

$487.14M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RYCEY vs. IESC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYCEY
RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

IESC
IESC Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
IESC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
IESC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESC Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYCEY vs. IESC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYCEYIESCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.39

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

7.50

-5.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.11

21.33

-16.22

RYCEY vs. IESC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYCEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the IESC Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYCEY and IESC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYCEYIESCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

2.64

-1.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.39

1.29

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

1.02

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.23

0.05

-0.29

Drawdowns

RYCEY vs. IESC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYCEY drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, roughly equal to the maximum IESC drawdown of -98.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYCEY and IESC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RYCEYIESCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.07%

-98.32%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.75%

-21.80%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.37%

-49.23%

+25.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.01%

-54.22%

-7.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.64%

-54.28%

-40.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.78%

-0.97%

-77.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.19%

-55.01%

-29.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.65%

7.66%

-0.01%

Volatility

RYCEY vs. IESC - Volatility Comparison

Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) have volatilities of 11.26% and 11.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RYCEYIESCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.26%

11.77%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.56%

49.79%

-17.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.74%

62.06%

-24.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.44%

53.94%

-10.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.35%

48.10%

+1.25%

Dividends

RYCEY vs. IESC - Dividend Comparison

RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, while IESC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RYCEY
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc
0.76%0.86%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.51%1.56%1.32%1.55%4.19%14.44%

Financials

RYCEY vs. IESC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rolls-Royce Holdings plc and IES Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B202120222023202420252026
11.64B
974.20M
(RYCEY) Total Revenue
(IESC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RYCEY vs. IESC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rolls-Royce Holdings plc and IES Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%202120222023202420252026
27.4%
24.5%
Portfolio components
RYCEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

IESC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 238.70M and revenue of 974.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

RYCEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

IESC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.30M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

RYCEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.

IESC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 110.00M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RYCEY and IESC have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IESC has higher volatility (11.77%) compared to RYCEY (11.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RYCEY dropped -99.07% vs IESC's -98.32%.

IESC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RYCEY and IESC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer