PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RY.TO vs. BBD-A.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RY.TO vs. BBD-A.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Royal Bank of Canada (RY.TO) and Bombardier Inc (BBD-A.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RY.TO achieves a 18.14% return, which is significantly lower than BBD-A.TO's 30.82% return. Over the past 10 years, RY.TO has underperformed BBD-A.TO with an annualized return of 17.63%, while BBD-A.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.72% annualized return.


RY.TO

1D
0.75%
1M
9.58%
YTD
18.14%
6M
22.08%
1Y
60.90%
3Y*
34.84%
5Y*
21.23%
10Y*
17.63%

BBD-A.TO

1D
-0.15%
1M
4.33%
YTD
30.82%
6M
32.36%
1Y
202.38%
3Y*
72.33%
5Y*
56.93%
10Y*
18.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RY.TO vs. BBD-A.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RY.TO
Royal Bank of Canada
18.14%39.60%34.37%9.80%-1.52%33.09%6.52%14.33%-5.50%17.12%
BBD-A.TO
Bombardier Inc
30.82%139.44%81.98%0.96%22.36%110.98%-57.73%-6.73%-31.80%30.90%

Correlation

The correlation between RY.TO and BBD-A.TO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2006

0.31

The correlation between RY.TO and BBD-A.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (10 years) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RY.TO:

CA$380.74B

BBD-A.TO:

CA$30.61B

EPS

RY.TO:

CA$15.77

BBD-A.TO:

CA$9.32

PE Ratio

RY.TO:

17.29

BBD-A.TO:

32.68

PEG Ratio

RY.TO:

2.54

BBD-A.TO:

0.83

PS Ratio

RY.TO:

3.18

BBD-A.TO:

3.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

RY.TO:

CA$120.33B

BBD-A.TO:

CA$9.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RY.TO:

CA$65.64B

BBD-A.TO:

CA$1.88B

EBITDA (TTM)

RY.TO:

CA$14.74B

BBD-A.TO:

CA$1.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RY.TO vs. BBD-A.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RY.TO
RY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
RY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
RY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

BBD-A.TO
BBD-A.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BBD-A.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBD-A.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBD-A.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
BBD-A.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBD-A.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RY.TO vs. BBD-A.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royal Bank of Canada (RY.TO) and Bombardier Inc (BBD-A.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RY.TOBBD-A.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.82

1.57

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.53

10.97

-3.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.96

33.02

-5.06

RY.TO vs. BBD-A.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.44, which is comparable to the BBD-A.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RY.TO and BBD-A.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RY.TOBBD-A.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.44

3.93

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.43

1.08

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

0.34

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.13

+0.51

Drawdowns

RY.TO vs. BBD-A.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RY.TO drawdown since its inception was -54.03%, smaller than the maximum BBD-A.TO drawdown of -95.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RY.TO and BBD-A.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RY.TOBBD-A.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.03%

-95.71%

+41.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.12%

-18.57%

+10.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.00%

-39.01%

+23.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.21%

-61.30%

+40.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.84%

-93.09%

+59.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.40%

+6.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.72%

-56.36%

+49.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

6.16%

-3.98%

Volatility

RY.TO vs. BBD-A.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Royal Bank of Canada (RY.TO) is 4.64%, while Bombardier Inc (BBD-A.TO) has a volatility of 12.80%. This indicates that RY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBD-A.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RY.TOBBD-A.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

12.80%

-8.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.41%

40.73%

-30.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.81%

51.96%

-38.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.93%

53.08%

-38.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.27%

56.22%

-38.95%

Dividends

RY.TO vs. BBD-A.TO - Dividend Comparison

RY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, while BBD-A.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBD-A.TO
Bombardier Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RY.TO
Royal Bank of Canada
2.33%2.58%3.23%3.99%3.90%3.22%4.10%3.96%4.03%3.39%3.57%4.15%

Financials

RY.TO vs. BBD-A.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Royal Bank of Canada and Bombardier Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
33.95B
1.57B
(RY.TO) Total Revenue
(BBD-A.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

RY.TO vs. BBD-A.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Royal Bank of Canada and Bombardier Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
48.7%
15.6%
Portfolio components
RY.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported a gross profit of 16.52B and revenue of 33.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.7%.

BBD-A.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bombardier Inc reported a gross profit of 245.90M and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.6%.

RY.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported an operating income of 7.10B and revenue of 33.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.

BBD-A.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bombardier Inc reported an operating income of 175.08M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

RY.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Royal Bank of Canada reported a net income of 5.51B and revenue of 33.95B, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.

BBD-A.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bombardier Inc reported a net income of 52.13M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RY.TO and BBD-A.TO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RY.TO and BBD-A.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer