PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RTX vs. MAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RTX vs. MAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RTX Corporation (RTX) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RTX achieves a -1.85% return, which is significantly lower than MAR's 26.66% return. Over the past 10 years, RTX has underperformed MAR with an annualized return of 15.28%, while MAR has yielded a comparatively higher 20.49% annualized return.


RTX

1D
-1.29%
1M
1.88%
YTD
-1.85%
6M
4.94%
1Y
30.49%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
17.55%
10Y*
15.28%

MAR

1D
-0.28%
1M
11.05%
YTD
26.66%
6M
36.53%
1Y
48.66%
3Y*
31.04%
5Y*
23.16%
10Y*
20.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RTX vs. MAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RTX
RTX Corporation
-1.85%61.44%40.76%-14.44%20.01%23.27%-7.70%43.82%-14.66%19.13%
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
26.66%12.31%24.92%53.06%-9.34%25.26%-12.53%41.49%-19.05%66.24%

Correlation

The correlation between RTX and MAR is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 1993

0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between RTX and MAR has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

RTX:

$5.34

MAR:

$12.66

PE Ratio

RTX:

33.48

MAR:

30.92

PEG Ratio

RTX:

1.33

MAR:

0.81

PS Ratio

RTX:

2.69

MAR:

3.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

RTX:

$90.37B

MAR:

$21.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RTX:

$18.27B

MAR:

$1.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

RTX:

$13.81B

MAR:

$3.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RTX vs. MAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RTX
RTX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
RTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
RTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

MAR
MAR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RTX vs. MAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RTX Corporation (RTX) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RTXMARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

3.87

-2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.44

9.70

-5.25

RTX vs. MAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is lower than the MAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RTX and MAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RTXMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28

1.87

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.81

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.63

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.47

-0.04

Drawdowns

RTX vs. MAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RTX drawdown since its inception was -55.14%, smaller than the maximum MAR drawdown of -75.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RTX and MAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RTXMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.14%

-75.59%

+20.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.32%

-12.65%

-6.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.92%

-30.50%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.84%

-30.50%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.98%

-61.26%

+9.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.44%

-0.28%

-15.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.03%

-14.91%

+1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.88%

5.03%

+1.85%

Volatility

RTX vs. MAR - Volatility Comparison

RTX Corporation (RTX) has a higher volatility of 7.46% compared to Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) at 6.25%. This indicates that RTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RTXMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.46%

6.25%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.86%

19.86%

-2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.06%

26.15%

-2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.86%

28.82%

-4.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.74%

32.89%

-5.15%

Dividends

RTX vs. MAR - Dividend Comparison

RTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, more than MAR's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
0.70%0.85%0.86%0.87%0.67%0.00%0.36%1.22%1.44%0.95%1.39%1.42%
RTX
RTX Corporation
1.55%1.46%2.14%2.76%2.14%2.33%21.21%1.96%2.66%2.13%2.39%2.66%

Financials

RTX vs. MAR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RTX Corporation and Marriott International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
22.08B
1.81B
(RTX) Total Revenue
(MAR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RTX and MAR have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RTX has higher volatility (7.46%) compared to MAR (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RTX dropped -55.14% vs MAR's -75.59%.

MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RTX and MAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer