RSPN vs. ACHR
RSPN (Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF) is Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials Index, while ACHR (Archer Aviation Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, RSPN returned 11.25%/yr vs -10.82%/yr for ACHR. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RSPN vs. ACHR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSPN achieves a 8.05% return, which is significantly higher than ACHR's -23.80% return.
RSPN
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 8.05%
- 6M
- 8.82%
- 1Y
- 16.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.91%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 14.32%
ACHR
- 1D
- 3.43%
- 1M
- -11.57%
- YTD
- -23.80%
- 6M
- -33.45%
- 1Y
- -43.77%
- 3Y*
- 20.81%
- 5Y*
- -10.82%
- 10Y*
- —
RSPN vs. ACHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF | 8.05% | 13.84% | 17.63% | 22.32% | -8.79% | 26.07% | 0.31% |
ACHR Archer Aviation Inc. | -23.80% | -22.87% | 58.79% | 228.34% | -69.04% | -39.96% | 0.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPN and ACHR is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2020 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSPN vs. ACHR — Risk / Return Rank
RSPN
ACHR
RSPN vs. ACHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) and Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSPN | ACHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.93 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | -0.69 | +2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.58 | -1.08 | +5.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSPN | ACHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | -0.62 | +1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | -0.13 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | -0.12 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
RSPN vs. ACHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPN drawdown since its inception was -59.61%, smaller than the maximum ACHR drawdown of -90.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPN and ACHR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSPN | ACHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.61% | -90.49% | +30.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.36% | -63.78% | +51.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.89% | -63.78% | +42.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | -84.00% | +62.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.29% | -66.57% | +62.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -62.50% | +54.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 40.38% | -36.81% |
Volatility
RSPN vs. ACHR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) is 3.63%, while Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) has a volatility of 19.42%. This indicates that RSPN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSPN | ACHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 19.42% | -15.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.15% | 43.60% | -31.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.39% | 71.28% | -55.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 84.22% | -66.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.36% | 82.17% | -61.81% |
Dividends
RSPN vs. ACHR - Dividend Comparison
RSPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while ACHR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACHR Archer Aviation Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSPN Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Industrials ETF | 0.81% | 0.86% | 0.98% | 1.06% | 1.09% | 0.70% | 0.96% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 1.12% | 1.31% | 1.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSPN and ACHR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACHR has higher volatility (19.42%) compared to RSPN (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPN dropped -59.61% vs ACHR's -90.49%.
RSPN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSPN and ACHR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer