RSI.TO vs. CU.TO
RSI.TO (Rogers Sugar Inc.) and CU.TO (Canadian Utilities Limited) are both stocks. RSI.TO operates in Confectioners (Consumer Defensive), while CU.TO operates in Utilities - Diversified (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, RSI.TO returned 8.12%/yr vs 8.06%/yr for CU.TO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RSI.TO vs. CU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSI.TO achieves a 15.68% return, which is significantly lower than CU.TO's 20.62% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSI.TO having a 8.12% annualized return and CU.TO not far behind at 8.06%.
RSI.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 15.68%
- 6M
- 18.43%
- 1Y
- 28.61%
- 3Y*
- 11.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.30%
- 10Y*
- 8.12%
CU.TO
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 20.62%
- 6M
- 23.87%
- 1Y
- 40.11%
- 3Y*
- 17.75%
- 5Y*
- 12.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.06%
RSI.TO vs. CU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSI.TO Rogers Sugar Inc. | 15.68% | 7.81% | 16.22% | 0.71% | 1.50% | 12.89% | 22.74% | -3.50% | -8.26% | -1.78% |
CU.TO Canadian Utilities Limited | 20.62% | 28.75% | 15.61% | -8.24% | 4.73% | 24.14% | -16.53% | 31.00% | -12.18% | 7.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSI.TO and CU.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2006 | 0.16 |
The correlation between RSI.TO and CU.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.23 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RSI.TO:
CA$1.02B
CU.TO:
CA$13.78B
RSI.TO:
CA$0.47
CU.TO:
CA$0.39
RSI.TO:
14.35
CU.TO:
128.56
RSI.TO:
0.80
CU.TO:
3.73
RSI.TO:
2.14
CU.TO:
2.75
RSI.TO:
CA$1.24B
CU.TO:
CA$3.69B
RSI.TO:
CA$199.73M
CU.TO:
CA$905.00M
RSI.TO:
CA$150.40M
CU.TO:
CA$1.82B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSI.TO vs. CU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RSI.TO
CU.TO
RSI.TO vs. CU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rogers Sugar Inc. (RSI.TO) and Canadian Utilities Limited (CU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSI.TO | CU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.57 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 5.56 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.28 | 19.18 | -9.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSI.TO | CU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 3.07 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.88 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.44 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
RSI.TO vs. CU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSI.TO drawdown since its inception was -42.56%, which is greater than CU.TO's maximum drawdown of -40.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSI.TO and CU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSI.TO | CU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.56% | -40.15% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.81% | -7.24% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.51% | -20.02% | +4.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.14% | -27.68% | +8.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.47% | -40.15% | +5.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.96% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.10% | -9.72% | +0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 2.10% | +0.99% |
Volatility
RSI.TO vs. CU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rogers Sugar Inc. (RSI.TO) is 2.78%, while Canadian Utilities Limited (CU.TO) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that RSI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSI.TO | CU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.78% | 4.33% | -1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.19% | 10.49% | -1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.52% | 13.17% | +1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 14.53% | +1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 18.42% | +0.45% |
Dividends
RSI.TO vs. CU.TO - Dividend Comparison
RSI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, more than CU.TO's 3.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CU.TO Canadian Utilities Limited | 3.64% | 4.28% | 5.20% | 5.63% | 4.85% | 4.79% | 5.60% | 4.32% | 5.02% | 3.82% | 3.59% | 3.69% |
RSI.TO Rogers Sugar Inc. | 5.30% | 6.05% | 6.13% | 6.69% | 6.33% | 6.05% | 6.42% | 7.32% | 6.62% | 5.70% | 5.29% | 8.49% |
Financials
RSI.TO vs. CU.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rogers Sugar Inc. and Canadian Utilities Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RSI.TO vs. CU.TO - Profitability Comparison
RSI.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rogers Sugar Inc. reported a gross profit of 48.72M and revenue of 280.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.4%.
CU.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Utilities Limited reported a gross profit of 474.00M and revenue of 1.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.7%.
RSI.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rogers Sugar Inc. reported an operating income of 27.98M and revenue of 280.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
CU.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Utilities Limited reported an operating income of 393.00M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.3%.
RSI.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rogers Sugar Inc. reported a net income of 12.65M and revenue of 280.62M, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
CU.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Utilities Limited reported a net income of 224.00M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RSI.TO and CU.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for RSI.TO and CU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer