RSG vs. ED
RSG (Republic Services, Inc.) and ED (Consolidated Edison, Inc.) are both stocks. RSG operates in Waste Management (Industrials), while ED operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, RSG returned 17.16%/yr vs 6.82%/yr for ED. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RSG vs. ED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSG achieves a -2.74% return, which is significantly lower than ED's 6.73% return. Over the past 10 years, RSG has outperformed ED with an annualized return of 17.16%, while ED has yielded a comparatively lower 6.82% annualized return.
RSG
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- -2.74%
- 6M
- -2.52%
- 1Y
- -18.10%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- 14.87%
- 10Y*
- 17.16%
ED
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 11.06%
- 1Y
- 6.07%
- 3Y*
- 7.34%
- 5Y*
- 10.07%
- 10Y*
- 6.82%
RSG vs. ED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSG Republic Services, Inc. | -2.74% | 6.44% | 23.03% | 29.64% | -6.16% | 47.03% | 9.53% | 26.62% | 8.85% | 20.96% |
ED Consolidated Edison, Inc. | 6.73% | 15.15% | 1.55% | -1.12% | 15.65% | 22.96% | -16.99% | 22.54% | -6.62% | 19.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSG and ED is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1998 | 0.31 |
The correlation between RSG and ED shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RSG:
$63.34B
ED:
$38.01B
RSG:
$6.98
ED:
$5.94
RSG:
29.36
ED:
17.55
RSG:
2.07
ED:
1.25
RSG:
3.82
ED:
2.20
RSG:
5.29
ED:
1.62
RSG:
$16.70B
ED:
$17.22B
RSG:
$3.80B
ED:
$11.62B
RSG:
$4.89B
ED:
$8.47B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSG vs. ED — Risk / Return Rank
RSG
ED
RSG vs. ED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) and Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSG | ED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.07 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 0.63 | -1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | 1.35 | -2.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSG | ED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.99 | 0.37 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.54 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.33 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.37 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
RSG vs. ED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSG drawdown since its inception was -65.99%, smaller than the maximum ED drawdown of -78.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSG and ED.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSG | ED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.99% | -78.90% | +12.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.63% | -9.63% | -11.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.54% | -17.36% | -5.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.54% | -22.03% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.02% | -30.91% | -3.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.72% | -8.90% | -10.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.83% | -13.24% | +1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.70% | 4.52% | +8.18% |
Volatility
RSG vs. ED - Volatility Comparison
Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) has a higher volatility of 6.85% compared to Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) at 5.44%. This indicates that RSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSG | ED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | 5.44% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.54% | 12.12% | +1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.39% | 16.55% | +1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 18.77% | -0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 21.01% | -1.95% |
Dividends
RSG vs. ED - Dividend Comparison
RSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than ED's 3.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ED Consolidated Edison, Inc. | 3.33% | 3.42% | 3.72% | 3.56% | 3.32% | 3.63% | 4.23% | 3.27% | 3.74% | 3.25% | 3.64% | 4.05% |
RSG Republic Services, Inc. | 1.20% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.74% | 2.00% | 1.97% | 2.17% | 2.64% |
Financials
RSG vs. ED - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Republic Services, Inc. and Consolidated Edison, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RSG vs. ED - Profitability Comparison
RSG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ED - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.15B and revenue of 5.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.5%.
RSG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 830.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.
ED - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.18B and revenue of 5.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
RSG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a net income of 525.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
ED - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Consolidated Edison, Inc. reported a net income of 924.00M and revenue of 5.10B, resulting in a net margin of 18.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RSG and ED have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSG has higher volatility (6.85%) compared to ED (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSG dropped -65.99% vs ED's -78.90%.
ED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSG and ED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer