RSG vs. COST
RSG (Republic Services, Inc.) and COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) are both stocks. RSG operates in Waste Management (Industrials), while COST operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, RSG returned 17.16%/yr vs 22.25%/yr for COST. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RSG vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSG achieves a -2.74% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 13.35% return. Over the past 10 years, RSG has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 17.16%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.25% annualized return.
RSG
- 1D
- -2.43%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- -2.74%
- 6M
- -2.52%
- 1Y
- -18.10%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- 14.87%
- 10Y*
- 17.16%
COST
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- -3.42%
- 3Y*
- 25.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.05%
- 10Y*
- 22.25%
RSG vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSG Republic Services, Inc. | -2.74% | 6.44% | 23.03% | 29.64% | -6.16% | 47.03% | 9.53% | 26.62% | 8.85% | 20.96% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 13.35% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 45.70% | 10.60% | 22.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSG and COST is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1998 | 0.32 |
The correlation between RSG and COST shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RSG:
$6.98
COST:
$26.51
RSG:
29.36
COST:
36.77
RSG:
2.07
COST:
2.88
RSG:
3.82
COST:
1.11
RSG:
$16.70B
COST:
$293.59B
RSG:
$3.80B
COST:
$11.12B
RSG:
$4.89B
COST:
$12.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSG vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank
RSG
COST
RSG vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSG | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 0.98 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | -0.22 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.47 | -0.51 | -0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSG | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.99 | -0.18 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.98 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 1.02 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.59 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
RSG vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSG drawdown since its inception was -65.99%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSG and COST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSG | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.99% | -53.39% | -12.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.63% | -15.38% | -5.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.54% | -20.74% | -1.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.54% | -31.40% | +8.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.02% | -31.40% | -2.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.72% | -10.93% | -8.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.83% | -13.36% | +1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.70% | 7.15% | +5.55% |
Volatility
RSG vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) is 6.85%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that RSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSG | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | 7.71% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.54% | 14.53% | -0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.39% | 18.79% | -0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 22.71% | -4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.06% | 21.95% | -2.89% |
Dividends
RSG vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
RSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than COST's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
RSG Republic Services, Inc. | 1.20% | 1.12% | 0.82% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.74% | 2.00% | 1.97% | 2.17% | 2.64% |
Financials
RSG vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Republic Services, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RSG vs. COST - Profitability Comparison
RSG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
COST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.
RSG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 830.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.
COST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.
RSG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a net income of 525.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
COST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RSG and COST have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COST has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to RSG (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSG dropped -65.99% vs COST's -53.39%.
COST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.18 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSG and COST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer