PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSG vs. COR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RSG vs. COR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) and Cencora Inc. (COR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSG achieves a -2.74% return, which is significantly higher than COR's -18.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSG having a 17.16% annualized return and COR not far behind at 17.00%.


RSG

1D
-2.43%
1M
2.45%
YTD
-2.74%
6M
-2.52%
1Y
-18.10%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
14.87%
10Y*
17.16%

COR

1D
-0.35%
1M
5.22%
YTD
-18.53%
6M
-18.54%
1Y
-4.43%
3Y*
16.42%
5Y*
20.49%
10Y*
17.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSG vs. COR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSG
Republic Services, Inc.
-2.74%6.44%23.03%29.64%-6.16%47.03%9.53%26.62%8.85%20.96%
COR
Cencora Inc.
-18.53%51.48%10.37%25.33%26.26%44.09%23.37%23.51%-17.57%19.51%

Correlation

The correlation between RSG and COR is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1998

0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RSG:

$63.34B

COR:

$53.55B

EPS

RSG:

$6.98

COR:

$13.07

PE Ratio

RSG:

29.36

COR:

20.97

PEG Ratio

RSG:

2.07

COR:

9.96

PS Ratio

RSG:

3.82

COR:

0.16

PB Ratio

RSG:

5.29

COR:

15.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

RSG:

$16.70B

COR:

$328.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RSG:

$3.80B

COR:

$11.66B

EBITDA (TTM)

RSG:

$4.89B

COR:

$3.64B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSG vs. COR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSG
RSG Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
RSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSG Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
RSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSG Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

COR
COR Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
COR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
COR Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
COR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
COR Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSG vs. COR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) and Cencora Inc. (COR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RSGCORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.00

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.88

-0.14

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.47

-0.39

-1.07

RSG vs. COR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSG Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the COR Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSG and COR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RSGCORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

-0.15

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.92

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.62

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.54

-0.15

Drawdowns

RSG vs. COR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSG drawdown since its inception was -65.99%, smaller than the maximum COR drawdown of -71.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSG and COR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSGCORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.99%

-71.01%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.63%

-32.44%

+11.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.54%

-32.44%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.54%

-32.44%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.02%

-32.44%

-1.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.72%

-26.57%

+6.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.83%

-13.62%

+1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.70%

11.26%

+1.44%

Volatility

RSG vs. COR - Volatility Comparison

Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) and Cencora Inc. (COR) have volatilities of 6.85% and 7.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSGCORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.85%

7.05%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.54%

26.87%

-13.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.39%

30.25%

-11.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.11%

22.34%

-4.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.06%

27.49%

-8.43%

Dividends

RSG vs. COR - Dividend Comparison

RSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than COR's 0.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COR
Cencora Inc.
0.86%0.67%0.93%0.96%1.13%5.13%6.74%7.48%2.07%1.61%1.77%1.17%
RSG
Republic Services, Inc.
1.20%1.12%0.82%1.25%1.48%1.27%1.72%1.74%2.00%1.97%2.17%2.64%

Financials

RSG vs. COR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Republic Services, Inc. and Cencora Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
4.11B
78.36B
(RSG) Total Revenue
(COR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RSG vs. COR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Republic Services, Inc. and Cencora Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%202220232024202520260
4.6%
Portfolio components
RSG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

COR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.59B and revenue of 78.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.6%.

RSG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 830.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.

COR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported an operating income of 1.14B and revenue of 78.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.5%.

RSG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Republic Services, Inc. reported a net income of 525.00M and revenue of 4.11B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.

COR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported a net income of 1.64B and revenue of 78.36B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RSG and COR have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COR has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to RSG (6.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSG dropped -65.99% vs COR's -71.01%.

COR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSG and COR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer