RR vs. ET
RR (Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock) and ET (Energy Transfer LP) are both stocks. RR operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while ET operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past year, RR returned 3.18% vs 16.21% for ET. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RR vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RR achieves a -24.61% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 21.54% return.
RR
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -7.77%
- YTD
- -24.61%
- 6M
- -44.41%
- 1Y
- 3.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ET
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 21.54%
- 6M
- 19.30%
- 1Y
- 16.21%
- 3Y*
- 24.40%
- 5Y*
- 21.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
RR vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RR Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock | -24.61% | 19.63% | -54.62% | 19.00% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 21.54% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 4.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between RR and ET is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2023 | 0.05 |
The correlation between RR and ET shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RR:
$473.83M
ET:
$66.87B
RR:
-$0.11
ET:
$1.36
RR:
71.47
ET:
0.77
RR:
1.76
ET:
1.34
RR:
$5.05M
ET:
$89.38B
RR:
$3.29M
ET:
$20.48B
RR:
-$12.64M
ET:
$13.02B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RR vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank
RR
ET
RR vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock (RR) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RR | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.18 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 1.62 | -1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.07 | 3.55 | -3.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RR | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 | 1.01 | -0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 0.36 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
RR vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RR drawdown since its inception was -96.67%, which is greater than ET's maximum drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RR and ET.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RR | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.67% | -87.81% | -8.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.37% | -10.02% | -63.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.06% | -5.15% | -72.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.83% | -25.74% | -49.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.57% | 4.57% | +41.00% |
Volatility
RR vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock (RR) has a higher volatility of 31.92% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.27%. This indicates that RR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RR | ET | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.92% | 5.27% | +26.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 80.35% | 11.84% | +68.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 119.34% | 16.12% | +103.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 164.25% | 24.87% | +139.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 164.25% | 35.02% | +129.23% |
Dividends
RR vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
RR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.90% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
RR Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RR vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Richtech Robotics Inc. Class B Common Stock and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
RR and ET have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RR has higher volatility (31.92%) compared to ET (5.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RR dropped -96.67% vs ET's -87.81%.
ET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RR and ET
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer