PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RR.L vs. JNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RR.L vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RR.L is traded in GBp, while JNJ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the JNJ values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RR.L achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 14.87% return. Over the past 10 years, RR.L has outperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 20.45%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively lower 10.83% annualized return.


RR.L

1D
-0.08%
1M
3.21%
YTD
9.96%
6M
14.23%
1Y
43.48%
3Y*
104.71%
5Y*
62.63%
10Y*
20.45%

JNJ

1D
0.00%
1M
8.10%
YTD
14.87%
6M
16.57%
1Y
56.05%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
10.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RR.L vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RR.L
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC
9.96%104.79%89.72%221.57%-24.15%10.45%-52.55%-16.52%-0.63%27.42%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
14.53%36.97%-3.15%-13.15%18.58%12.49%7.57%11.80%0.49%13.67%

Correlation

The correlation between RR.L and JNJ is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007

0.11

The correlation between RR.L and JNJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RR.L:

£105.78B

JNJ:

$567.68B

EPS

RR.L:

£0.99

JNJ:

$8.65

PE Ratio

RR.L:

12.70

JNJ:

26.85

PEG Ratio

RR.L:

0.03

JNJ:

0.89

PS Ratio

RR.L:

2.65

JNJ:

5.86

PB Ratio

RR.L:

38.81

JNJ:

6.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

RR.L:

£40.12B

JNJ:

$96.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RR.L:

£10.12B

JNJ:

$66.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

RR.L:

£9.20B

JNJ:

$31.62B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RR.L vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RR.L
RR.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
RR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
RR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

JNJ
JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RR.L vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RR.LJNJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.56

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

4.53

-2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.34

14.39

-8.05

RR.L vs. JNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RR.L and JNJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RR.LJNJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

3.25

-2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.49

0.64

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.55

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.68

-0.39

Drawdowns

RR.L vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RR.L drawdown since its inception was -90.25%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -23.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RR.L and JNJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RR.LJNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.25%

-23.28%

-66.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.04%

-12.44%

-6.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.78%

-16.22%

-5.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.09%

-23.28%

-31.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.41%

-23.28%

-66.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.22%

-5.35%

-1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.29%

-6.93%

-21.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.84%

3.91%

+2.93%

Volatility

RR.L vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) has a higher volatility of 11.59% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 6.24%. This indicates that RR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RR.LJNJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.59%

6.24%

+5.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.80%

13.14%

+17.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.96%

17.39%

+18.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.02%

17.71%

+24.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.59%

19.95%

+28.64%

Dividends

RR.L vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

RR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than JNJ's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.26%2.48%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%
RR.L
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC
0.75%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.71%1.41%0.54%1.75%4.06%

Financials

RR.L vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B202120222023202420252026
11.72B
24.06B
(RR.L) Total Revenue
(JNJ) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RR.L values in GBp, JNJ values in USD

RR.L vs. JNJ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC and Johnson & Johnson over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%202120222023202420252026
27.4%
71.5%
Portfolio components
RR.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a gross profit of 3.21B and revenue of 11.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

JNJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 17.20B and revenue of 24.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.

RR.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported an operating income of 3.25B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

JNJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.40B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

RR.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a net income of 1.43B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.

JNJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.24B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RR.L and JNJ have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RR.L and JNJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer