PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RR.L vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RR.L vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RR.L is traded in GBp, while BRK-B is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BRK-B values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RR.L achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -1.91% return. Over the past 10 years, RR.L has outperformed BRK-B with an annualized return of 20.45%, while BRK-B has yielded a comparatively lower 13.92% annualized return.


RR.L

1D
-0.08%
1M
3.21%
YTD
9.96%
6M
14.23%
1Y
43.48%
3Y*
104.71%
5Y*
62.63%
10Y*
20.45%

BRK-B

1D
0.00%
1M
4.81%
YTD
-1.91%
6M
-1.96%
1Y
0.29%
3Y*
11.13%
5Y*
12.35%
10Y*
13.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RR.L vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RR.L
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC
9.96%104.79%89.72%221.57%-24.15%10.45%-52.55%-16.52%-0.63%27.42%
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
-1.91%2.99%29.31%9.69%15.59%30.17%-0.64%6.71%9.11%11.10%

Correlation

The correlation between RR.L and BRK-B is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007

0.21

The correlation between RR.L and BRK-B shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RR.L:

£105.78B

BRK-B:

$1.05T

EPS

RR.L:

£0.99

BRK-B:

$33.62

PE Ratio

RR.L:

12.70

BRK-B:

14.49

PEG Ratio

RR.L:

0.03

BRK-B:

0.56

PS Ratio

RR.L:

2.65

BRK-B:

2.80

PB Ratio

RR.L:

38.81

BRK-B:

1.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

RR.L:

£40.12B

BRK-B:

$375.39B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RR.L:

£10.12B

BRK-B:

$94.36B

EBITDA (TTM)

RR.L:

£9.20B

BRK-B:

$71.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RR.L vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RR.L
RR.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
RR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
RR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RR.L vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RR.LBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.02

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

0.02

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.34

0.05

+6.29

RR.L vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RR.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RR.L and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RR.LBRK-BDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

0.02

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.49

0.73

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.70

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.59

-0.30

Drawdowns

RR.L vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RR.L drawdown since its inception was -90.25%, which is greater than BRK-B's maximum drawdown of -37.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RR.L and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RR.LBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.25%

-37.92%

-52.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.04%

-11.88%

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.78%

-17.26%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.09%

-20.84%

-34.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.41%

-21.44%

-67.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.22%

-11.67%

+4.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.29%

-7.39%

-20.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.84%

5.52%

+1.32%

Volatility

RR.L vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) has a higher volatility of 11.59% compared to Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) at 4.39%. This indicates that RR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RR.LBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.59%

4.39%

+7.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.80%

12.12%

+18.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.96%

15.51%

+20.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.02%

16.93%

+25.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.59%

19.87%

+28.72%

Dividends

RR.L vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

RR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RR.L
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC
0.75%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.71%1.41%0.54%1.75%4.06%

Financials

RR.L vs. BRK-B - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC and Berkshire Hathaway Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B202120222023202420252026
11.72B
93.68B
(RR.L) Total Revenue
(BRK-B) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RR.L values in GBp, BRK-B values in USD

RR.L vs. BRK-B - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%202120222023202420252026
27.4%
28.8%
Portfolio components
RR.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a gross profit of 3.21B and revenue of 11.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

BRK-B - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a gross profit of 26.98B and revenue of 93.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.8%.

RR.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported an operating income of 3.25B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

BRK-B - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported an operating income of 15.05B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.1%.

RR.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a net income of 1.43B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.

BRK-B - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Berkshire Hathaway Inc. reported a net income of 10.18B and revenue of 93.68B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RR.L and BRK-B have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RR.L and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer