RR.L vs. APG
RR.L (Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC) and APG (APi Group Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — RR.L in Aerospace & Defense, APG in Engineering & Construction. Over the past 5 years, RR.L returned 62.63%/yr vs 23.98%/yr for APG. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RR.L vs. APG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RR.L is traded in GBp, while APG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the APG values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RR.L achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly lower than APG's 10.83% return.
RR.L
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 9.96%
- 6M
- 14.23%
- 1Y
- 43.48%
- 3Y*
- 104.71%
- 5Y*
- 62.63%
- 10Y*
- 20.45%
APG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 31.01%
- 3Y*
- 34.11%
- 5Y*
- 23.98%
- 10Y*
- —
RR.L vs. APG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | 9.96% | 104.79% | 89.72% | 221.57% | -24.15% | 10.45% | -9.34% |
APG APi Group Corporation | 11.37% | 48.18% | 5.78% | 74.75% | -18.33% | 43.33% | 59.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between RR.L and APG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2020 | 0.24 |
The correlation between RR.L and APG shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RR.L:
£105.78B
APG:
$18.36B
RR.L:
£0.99
APG:
$0.73
RR.L:
12.70
APG:
57.90
RR.L:
0.03
APG:
0.12
RR.L:
2.65
APG:
2.19
RR.L:
38.81
APG:
5.27
RR.L:
£40.12B
APG:
$8.17B
RR.L:
£10.12B
APG:
$2.57B
RR.L:
£9.20B
APG:
$820.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RR.L vs. APG — Risk / Return Rank
RR.L
APG
RR.L vs. APG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) and APi Group Corporation (APG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RR.L | APG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.21 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 1.80 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.34 | 5.44 | +0.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RR.L | APG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 1.13 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.49 | 0.76 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 1.02 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
RR.L vs. APG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RR.L drawdown since its inception was -90.25%, which is greater than APG's maximum drawdown of -40.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RR.L and APG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RR.L | APG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.25% | -40.11% | -50.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.04% | -17.35% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.78% | -23.99% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.09% | -40.11% | -14.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.22% | -13.76% | +6.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.29% | -8.97% | -19.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.84% | 5.72% | +1.12% |
Volatility
RR.L vs. APG - Volatility Comparison
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC (RR.L) has a higher volatility of 11.59% compared to APi Group Corporation (APG) at 7.66%. This indicates that RR.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RR.L | APG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.59% | 7.66% | +3.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.80% | 21.37% | +9.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.96% | 27.70% | +8.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.02% | 31.67% | +10.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.59% | 32.33% | +16.26% |
Dividends
RR.L vs. APG - Dividend Comparison
RR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while APG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APG APi Group Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RR.L Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | 0.75% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.71% | 1.41% | 0.54% | 1.75% | 4.06% |
Financials
RR.L vs. APG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC and APi Group Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RR.L vs. APG - Profitability Comparison
RR.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a gross profit of 3.21B and revenue of 11.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
APG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, APi Group Corporation reported a gross profit of 620.00M and revenue of 1.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.
RR.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported an operating income of 3.25B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.
APG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, APi Group Corporation reported an operating income of 103.00M and revenue of 1.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.2%.
RR.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC reported a net income of 1.43B and revenue of 11.72B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
APG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, APi Group Corporation reported a net income of 51.00M and revenue of 1.98B, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RR.L and APG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for RR.L and APG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer