ROK vs. CMI
ROK (Rockwell Automation, Inc.) and CMI (Cummins Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Industrial Machinery industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, ROK returned 16.64%/yr vs 22.34%/yr for CMI. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ROK vs. CMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROK achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly lower than CMI's 32.64% return. Over the past 10 years, ROK has underperformed CMI with an annualized return of 16.64%, while CMI has yielded a comparatively higher 22.34% annualized return.
ROK
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 16.85%
- 6M
- 13.03%
- 1Y
- 41.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.97%
- 10Y*
- 16.64%
CMI
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- 32.64%
- 6M
- 33.36%
- 1Y
- 109.28%
- 3Y*
- 46.82%
- 5Y*
- 24.12%
- 10Y*
- 22.34%
ROK vs. CMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 16.85% | 38.36% | -6.23% | 22.63% | -24.78% | 41.21% | 26.17% | 37.85% | -21.79% | 48.87% |
CMI Cummins Inc. | 32.64% | 49.36% | 48.92% | 1.72% | 14.09% | -1.68% | 30.50% | 38.04% | -22.06% | 32.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROK and CMI is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1987 | 0.47 |
The correlation between ROK and CMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ROK:
$50.86B
CMI:
$93.37B
ROK:
$9.63
CMI:
$19.27
ROK:
46.88
CMI:
34.90
ROK:
5.79
CMI:
2.75
ROK:
14.44
CMI:
7.56
ROK:
$8.80B
CMI:
$33.89B
ROK:
$4.63B
CMI:
$8.60B
ROK:
$1.56B
CMI:
$4.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROK vs. CMI — Risk / Return Rank
ROK
CMI
ROK vs. CMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) and Cummins Inc. (CMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROK | CMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.52 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 7.22 | -5.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.00 | 26.31 | -19.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROK | CMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 3.33 | -1.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.86 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.79 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.38 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
ROK vs. CMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROK drawdown since its inception was -75.83%, roughly equal to the maximum CMI drawdown of -75.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROK and CMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROK | CMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.83% | -75.66% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.73% | -15.23% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.84% | -30.48% | -4.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.09% | -30.48% | -14.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.09% | -44.05% | -1.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -5.81% | +3.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.88% | -22.23% | +7.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.91% | 4.17% | +1.74% |
Volatility
ROK vs. CMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK) is 7.86%, while Cummins Inc. (CMI) has a volatility of 12.18%. This indicates that ROK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROK | CMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.86% | 12.18% | -4.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.24% | 27.86% | -4.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.42% | 33.02% | -4.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.73% | 28.05% | +3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.45% | 28.26% | +3.19% |
Dividends
ROK vs. CMI - Dividend Comparison
ROK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than CMI's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMI Cummins Inc. | 1.19% | 1.50% | 2.01% | 2.71% | 2.49% | 2.57% | 2.33% | 2.74% | 3.32% | 2.38% | 2.93% | 3.99% |
ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 1.21% | 1.36% | 1.77% | 1.54% | 1.76% | 1.24% | 1.65% | 1.94% | 2.42% | 1.59% | 2.18% | 2.61% |
Financials
ROK vs. CMI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rockwell Automation, Inc. and Cummins Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ROK vs. CMI - Profitability Comparison
ROK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rockwell Automation, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.13B and revenue of 2.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.3%.
CMI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cummins Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.24B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.7%.
ROK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rockwell Automation, Inc. reported an operating income of 467.00M and revenue of 2.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.
CMI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cummins Inc. reported an operating income of 949.00M and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
ROK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rockwell Automation, Inc. reported a net income of 350.00M and revenue of 2.24B, resulting in a net margin of 15.6%.
CMI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cummins Inc. reported a net income of 654.00M and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ROK and CMI have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMI has higher volatility (12.18%) compared to ROK (7.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROK dropped -75.83% vs CMI's -75.66%.
CMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROK and CMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer