PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBO vs. ZBRA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBO vs. ZBRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBO achieves a 21.67% return, which is significantly higher than ZBRA's -4.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ROBO has underperformed ZBRA with an annualized return of 13.02%, while ZBRA has yielded a comparatively higher 15.32% annualized return.


ROBO

1D
1.14%
1M
-2.60%
YTD
21.67%
6M
19.42%
1Y
48.39%
3Y*
14.36%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*
13.02%

ZBRA

1D
0.40%
1M
3.10%
YTD
-4.03%
6M
-11.86%
1Y
-21.10%
3Y*
-5.33%
5Y*
-14.34%
10Y*
15.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBO vs. ZBRA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
21.67%23.71%-1.28%23.74%-33.92%15.34%45.26%29.51%-20.92%44.26%
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies Corporation
-4.03%-37.13%41.30%6.60%-56.92%54.87%50.46%60.42%53.40%21.04%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBO and ZBRA is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2013

0.65

The correlation between ROBO and ZBRA shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBO vs. ZBRA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBO
ROBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ROBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ZBRA
ZBRA Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
ZBRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZBRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZBRA Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
ZBRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZBRA Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBO vs. ZBRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROBOZBRADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

0.94

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

-0.51

+3.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.09

-0.88

+11.97

ROBO vs. ZBRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBO Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the ZBRA Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBO and ZBRA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROBOZBRADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

-0.51

+2.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

-0.36

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.39

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.24

+0.23

Drawdowns

ROBO vs. ZBRA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBO drawdown since its inception was -43.65%, smaller than the maximum ZBRA drawdown of -73.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO and ZBRA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBOZBRADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.65%

-73.42%

+29.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.35%

-41.62%

+24.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.92%

-52.67%

+24.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.65%

-67.78%

+24.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.65%

-67.78%

+24.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.65%

-62.08%

+55.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.93%

-27.69%

+14.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

23.98%

-19.60%

Volatility

ROBO vs. ZBRA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) is 9.66%, while Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) has a volatility of 16.92%. This indicates that ROBO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZBRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBOZBRADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.66%

16.92%

-7.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.04%

30.20%

-11.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.89%

41.55%

-17.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.79%

40.33%

-16.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.24%

39.31%

-16.07%

Dividends

ROBO vs. ZBRA - Dividend Comparison

ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while ZBRA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
0.35%0.42%0.55%0.05%0.00%0.18%0.20%0.37%0.37%0.02%0.19%0.28%
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROBO and ZBRA have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZBRA has higher volatility (16.92%) compared to ROBO (9.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBO dropped -43.65% vs ZBRA's -73.42%.

ROBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBO and ZBRA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer