PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBO vs. TER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBO vs. TER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBO achieves a 21.67% return, which is significantly lower than TER's 93.73% return. Over the past 10 years, ROBO has underperformed TER with an annualized return of 13.02%, while TER has yielded a comparatively higher 34.87% annualized return.


ROBO

1D
1.14%
1M
-2.60%
YTD
21.67%
6M
19.42%
1Y
48.39%
3Y*
14.36%
5Y*
5.97%
10Y*
13.02%

TER

1D
4.68%
1M
4.19%
YTD
93.73%
6M
84.73%
1Y
340.75%
3Y*
53.39%
5Y*
25.10%
10Y*
34.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBO vs. TER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
21.67%23.71%-1.28%23.74%-33.92%15.34%45.26%29.51%-20.92%44.26%
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
93.73%54.39%16.51%24.78%-46.35%36.81%76.73%118.93%-24.37%66.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBO and TER is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2013

0.70

The correlation between ROBO and TER has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBO vs. TER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBO
ROBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ROBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBO Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

TER
TER Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TER Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
TER Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
TER Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TER Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBO vs. TER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROBOTERDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.63

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

12.85

-10.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.09

46.52

-35.43

ROBO vs. TER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBO Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is lower than the TER Sharpe Ratio of 5.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBO and TER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROBOTERDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

5.19

-3.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.51

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.78

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.22

+0.25

Drawdowns

ROBO vs. TER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBO drawdown since its inception was -43.65%, smaller than the maximum TER drawdown of -97.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO and TER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBOTERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.65%

-97.30%

+53.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.35%

-26.73%

+9.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.92%

-58.18%

+30.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.65%

-59.12%

+15.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.65%

-59.12%

+15.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.65%

-10.34%

+3.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.93%

-58.69%

+45.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

7.37%

-2.99%

Volatility

ROBO vs. TER - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) is 9.66%, while Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a volatility of 21.89%. This indicates that ROBO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBOTERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.66%

21.89%

-12.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.04%

51.74%

-32.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.89%

66.25%

-42.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.79%

49.92%

-26.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.24%

45.15%

-21.91%

Dividends

ROBO vs. TER - Dividend Comparison

ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, more than TER's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
0.35%0.42%0.55%0.05%0.00%0.18%0.20%0.37%0.37%0.02%0.19%0.28%
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
0.13%0.25%0.38%0.41%0.50%0.24%0.33%0.53%1.15%0.67%0.94%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROBO and TER have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TER has higher volatility (21.89%) compared to ROBO (9.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBO dropped -43.65% vs TER's -97.30%.

TER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.19 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBO and TER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer