ROAD vs. FLR
ROAD (Construction Partners, Inc.) and FLR (Fluor Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 5 years, ROAD returned 25.85%/yr vs 19.94%/yr for FLR. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ROAD vs. FLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROAD achieves a -2.01% return, which is significantly lower than FLR's 24.96% return.
ROAD
- 1D
- -3.80%
- 1M
- -24.28%
- YTD
- -2.01%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- -3.62%
- 3Y*
- 49.37%
- 5Y*
- 25.85%
- 10Y*
- —
FLR
- 1D
- 4.12%
- 1M
- 14.34%
- YTD
- 24.96%
- 6M
- 14.23%
- 1Y
- 11.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.36%
- 5Y*
- 19.94%
- 10Y*
- 0.33%
ROAD vs. FLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROAD Construction Partners, Inc. | -2.01% | 22.71% | 103.26% | 63.06% | -9.25% | 1.03% | 72.55% | 91.05% | -32.08% |
FLR Fluor Corporation | 24.96% | -19.65% | 25.91% | 13.01% | 39.93% | 55.10% | -14.55% | -39.54% | -44.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROAD and FLR is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2018 | 0.43 |
The correlation between ROAD and FLR shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ROAD:
$2.27
FLR:
$2.65
ROAD:
46.86
FLR:
18.68
ROAD:
0.87
FLR:
0.04
ROAD:
1.83
FLR:
0.43
ROAD:
$3.26B
FLR:
$15.19B
ROAD:
$511.53M
FLR:
-$247.00M
ROAD:
$397.81M
FLR:
-$276.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROAD vs. FLR — Risk / Return Rank
ROAD
FLR
ROAD vs. FLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) and Fluor Corporation (FLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROAD | FLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.10 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 0.38 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.26 | 0.59 | -0.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROAD | FLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 0.22 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.44 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.13 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
ROAD vs. FLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROAD drawdown since its inception was -54.54%, smaller than the maximum FLR drawdown of -95.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROAD and FLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROAD | FLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.54% | -95.89% | +41.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.55% | -30.19% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.62% | -47.63% | +14.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.54% | -47.63% | -6.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -94.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.28% | -40.08% | +15.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.28% | -41.62% | +25.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.03% | 19.45% | -5.42% |
Volatility
ROAD vs. FLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) is 14.70%, while Fluor Corporation (FLR) has a volatility of 21.30%. This indicates that ROAD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROAD | FLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.70% | 21.30% | -6.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.78% | 34.11% | +2.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.25% | 52.24% | -4.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.45% | 45.18% | +0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.68% | 57.67% | -8.99% |
Dividends
ROAD vs. FLR - Dividend Comparison
Neither ROAD nor FLR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLR Fluor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 3.87% | 2.61% | 1.63% | 1.60% | 1.78% |
ROAD Construction Partners, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ROAD vs. FLR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Construction Partners, Inc. and Fluor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ROAD vs. FLR - Profitability Comparison
ROAD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a gross profit of 98.85M and revenue of 769.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.
FLR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported a gross profit of 13.00M and revenue of 3.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.4%.
ROAD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported an operating income of 37.38M and revenue of 769.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
FLR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported an operating income of 92.00M and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.
ROAD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a net income of 9.18M and revenue of 769.20M, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
FLR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fluor Corporation reported a net income of 160.00M and revenue of 3.66B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ROAD and FLR have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLR has higher volatility (21.30%) compared to ROAD (14.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROAD dropped -54.54% vs FLR's -95.89%.
FLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROAD and FLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer