ROAD vs. ACM
ROAD (Construction Partners, Inc.) and ACM (AECOM) are both stocks. Both operate in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 5 years, ROAD returned 25.85%/yr vs 2.79%/yr for ACM. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ROAD vs. ACM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROAD achieves a -2.01% return, which is significantly higher than ACM's -25.17% return.
ROAD
- 1D
- -3.80%
- 1M
- -24.28%
- YTD
- -2.01%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- -3.62%
- 3Y*
- 49.37%
- 5Y*
- 25.85%
- 10Y*
- —
ACM
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -12.09%
- YTD
- -25.17%
- 6M
- -29.69%
- 1Y
- -35.66%
- 3Y*
- -4.40%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
ROAD vs. ACM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROAD Construction Partners, Inc. | -2.01% | 22.71% | 103.26% | 63.06% | -9.25% | 1.03% | 72.55% | 91.05% | -32.08% |
ACM AECOM | -25.17% | -9.91% | 16.67% | 9.77% | 10.72% | 55.38% | 15.42% | 62.75% | -22.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROAD and ACM is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2018 | 0.43 |
Fundamentals
ROAD:
$5.98B
ACM:
$9.25B
ROAD:
$2.27
ACM:
$3.82
ROAD:
46.86
ACM:
18.53
ROAD:
0.87
ACM:
0.11
ROAD:
1.83
ACM:
0.59
ROAD:
6.11
ACM:
4.08
ROAD:
$3.26B
ACM:
$15.99B
ROAD:
$511.53M
ACM:
$1.24B
ROAD:
$397.81M
ACM:
$976.83M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROAD vs. ACM — Risk / Return Rank
ROAD
ACM
ROAD vs. ACM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) and AECOM (ACM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROAD | ACM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.78 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | -0.75 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.26 | -1.45 | +1.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROAD | ACM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | -1.12 | +1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.11 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.19 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
ROAD vs. ACM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROAD drawdown since its inception was -54.54%, smaller than the maximum ACM drawdown of -59.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROAD and ACM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROAD | ACM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.54% | -59.97% | +5.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.55% | -48.02% | +21.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.62% | -48.02% | +14.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.54% | -48.02% | -6.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.28% | -46.91% | +22.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.28% | -18.46% | +2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.03% | 24.54% | -10.51% |
Volatility
ROAD vs. ACM - Volatility Comparison
Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) and AECOM (ACM) have volatilities of 14.70% and 14.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROAD | ACM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.70% | 14.54% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.78% | 26.10% | +10.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.25% | 31.96% | +15.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.45% | 26.66% | +18.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.68% | 31.17% | +17.51% |
Dividends
ROAD vs. ACM - Dividend Comparison
ROAD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACM AECOM | 1.61% | 1.09% | 0.82% | 0.78% | 0.71% |
ROAD Construction Partners, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ROAD vs. ACM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Construction Partners, Inc. and AECOM. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ROAD vs. ACM - Profitability Comparison
ROAD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a gross profit of 98.85M and revenue of 769.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.9%.
ACM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AECOM reported a gross profit of 296.50M and revenue of 3.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.8%.
ROAD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported an operating income of 37.38M and revenue of 769.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.
ACM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AECOM reported an operating income of 229.65M and revenue of 3.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.
ROAD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Construction Partners, Inc. reported a net income of 9.18M and revenue of 769.20M, resulting in a net margin of 1.2%.
ACM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AECOM reported a net income of 179.86M and revenue of 3.80B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ROAD and ACM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROAD has higher volatility (14.70%) compared to ACM (14.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROAD dropped -54.54% vs ACM's -59.97%.
ROAD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROAD and ACM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer