PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNMBY vs. AVGO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RNMBY vs. AVGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNMBY achieves a -23.34% return, which is significantly lower than AVGO's 14.83% return. Over the past 10 years, RNMBY has underperformed AVGO with an annualized return of 38.34%, while AVGO has yielded a comparatively higher 41.32% annualized return.


RNMBY

1D
0.39%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
-23.34%
6M
-25.33%
1Y
-31.79%
3Y*
76.61%
5Y*
69.55%
10Y*
38.34%

AVGO

1D
2.82%
1M
-7.77%
YTD
14.83%
6M
-0.72%
1Y
61.91%
3Y*
72.46%
5Y*
56.70%
10Y*
41.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNMBY vs. AVGO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNMBY
Rheinmetall AG ADR
-23.34%190.28%99.83%63.35%122.00%-13.84%-2.03%28.14%-29.38%98.17%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
14.83%50.63%110.49%104.18%-13.27%56.48%44.88%29.05%2.18%48.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RNMBY and AVGO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2012

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RNMBY:

$64.70B

AVGO:

$1.93T

EPS

RNMBY:

$3.56

AVGO:

$6.01

PE Ratio

RNMBY:

77.79

AVGO:

65.99

PEG Ratio

RNMBY:

3.55

AVGO:

0.82

PS Ratio

RNMBY:

5.85

AVGO:

25.64

PB Ratio

RNMBY:

12.12

AVGO:

22.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

RNMBY:

$9.58B

AVGO:

$75.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RNMBY:

$4.12B

AVGO:

$50.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

RNMBY:

$1.81B

AVGO:

$41.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNMBY vs. AVGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNMBY
RNMBY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
RNMBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNMBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNMBY Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
RNMBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNMBY Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGO
AVGO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
AVGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNMBY vs. AVGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNMBYAVGODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.26

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

2.17

-2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.61

5.16

-6.78

RNMBY vs. AVGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNMBY Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the AVGO Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNMBY and AVGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNMBYAVGODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.69

1.38

-2.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.56

1.32

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

1.05

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

1.09

-0.29

Drawdowns

RNMBY vs. AVGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNMBY drawdown since its inception was -67.75%, which is greater than AVGO's maximum drawdown of -48.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNMBY and AVGO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNMBYAVGODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.75%

-48.30%

-19.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.06%

-28.67%

-15.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.06%

-41.15%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.06%

-41.15%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.75%

-48.30%

-19.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.13%

-17.64%

-22.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.71%

-7.97%

-8.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.74%

12.03%

+7.71%

Volatility

RNMBY vs. AVGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) is 16.15%, while Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) has a volatility of 20.09%. This indicates that RNMBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNMBYAVGODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.15%

20.09%

-3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.15%

34.69%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.49%

45.31%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.76%

43.31%

+1.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.55%

39.48%

+2.07%

Dividends

RNMBY vs. AVGO - Dividend Comparison

RNMBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than AVGO's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
0.63%0.70%0.94%1.71%3.02%2.24%3.05%3.54%3.11%1.87%1.43%1.13%
RNMBY
Rheinmetall AG ADR
0.98%0.49%0.96%1.46%1.82%1.72%1.56%1.36%1.47%2.06%2.97%0.53%

Financials

RNMBY vs. AVGO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rheinmetall AG ADR and Broadcom Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
1.97B
22.19B
(RNMBY) Total Revenue
(AVGO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RNMBY vs. AVGO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rheinmetall AG ADR and Broadcom Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
21.9%
67.2%
Portfolio components
RNMBY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a gross profit of 430.97M and revenue of 1.97B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.9%.

AVGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.92B and revenue of 22.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.

RNMBY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported an operating income of 178.89M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

AVGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 10.87B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.

RNMBY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a net income of 112.83M and revenue of 1.97B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.

AVGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in a net margin of 42.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RNMBY and AVGO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGO has higher volatility (20.09%) compared to RNMBY (16.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNMBY dropped -67.75% vs AVGO's -48.30%.

AVGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNMBY and AVGO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer