RMAU.L vs. EUIN.DE
RMAU.L (The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities) and EUIN.DE (Amundi Euro Inflation Expectations 2-10Y UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - RMAU.L is a Commodities fund tracking the LBMA Gold PM Price, while EUIN.DE is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx EUR Breakeven Euro-Inflation France & Germany. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RMAU.L returned 17.74%/yr vs 3.27%/yr for EUIN.DE. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RMAU.L charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EUIN.DE.
Performance
RMAU.L vs. EUIN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RMAU.L is traded in USD, while EUIN.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EUIN.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMAU.L achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than EUIN.DE's 2.92% return.
RMAU.L
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -8.12%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 29.71%
- 3Y*
- 29.86%
- 5Y*
- 17.74%
- 10Y*
- —
EUIN.DE
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- 4.81%
- 5Y*
- 3.27%
- 10Y*
- —
RMAU.L vs. EUIN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMAU.L The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities | 0.42% | 64.59% | 25.96% | 13.29% | -0.19% | -4.17% | 19.56% |
EUIN.DE Amundi Euro Inflation Expectations 2-10Y UCITS ETF Acc | 2.92% | 13.17% | -3.78% | 4.22% | 4.58% | -1.17% | 10.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMAU.L and EUIN.DE is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2020 | 0.20 |
The correlation between RMAU.L and EUIN.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMAU.L vs. EUIN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
RMAU.L
EUIN.DE
RMAU.L vs. EUIN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L) and Amundi Euro Inflation Expectations 2-10Y UCITS ETF Acc (EUIN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMAU.L | EUIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.14 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 2.11 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | 5.91 | -1.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMAU.L | EUIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 0.78 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 0.40 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.37 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
RMAU.L vs. EUIN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMAU.L drawdown since its inception was -21.25%, smaller than the maximum EUIN.DE drawdown of -22.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMAU.L and EUIN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMAU.L | EUIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.25% | -22.80% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.60% | -2.01% | -16.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.60% | -7.57% | -11.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.17% | -12.81% | -8.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.60% | -1.32% | -17.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.87% | -6.78% | -0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.04% | 0.72% | +6.32% |
Volatility
RMAU.L vs. EUIN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The Royal Mint Physical Gold ETC Securities (RMAU.L) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to Amundi Euro Inflation Expectations 2-10Y UCITS ETF Acc (EUIN.DE) at 1.80%. This indicates that RMAU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUIN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMAU.L | EUIN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.16% | 1.80% | +4.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.96% | 4.23% | +17.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.99% | 5.44% | +19.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.50% | 8.03% | +9.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 7.81% | +9.95% |
RMAU.L vs. EUIN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMAU.L has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than EUIN.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
RMAU.L vs. EUIN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither RMAU.L nor EUIN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
RMAU.L and EUIN.DE have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RMAU.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RMAU.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EUIN.DE.
RMAU.L is categorized as Commodities, while EUIN.DE is Inflation-Protected Bonds. RMAU.L tracks LBMA Gold PM Price, while EUIN.DE tracks iBoxx EUR Breakeven Euro-Inflation France & Germany. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for RMAU.L and 0.25% for EUIN.DE.
Find the right allocation for RMAU.L and EUIN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer