RJF vs. APO
RJF (Raymond James Financial, Inc.) and APO (Apollo Global Management, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — RJF in Capital Markets, APO in Asset Management. Over the past 10 years, RJF returned 17.32%/yr vs 28.04%/yr for APO. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
RJF vs. APO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RJF achieves a -5.81% return, which is significantly higher than APO's -11.14% return. Over the past 10 years, RJF has underperformed APO with an annualized return of 17.32%, while APO has yielded a comparatively higher 28.04% annualized return.
RJF
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -2.68%
- YTD
- -5.81%
- 6M
- -7.87%
- 1Y
- 3.71%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- 17.32%
APO
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -3.82%
- YTD
- -11.14%
- 6M
- -6.37%
- 1Y
- -2.88%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 19.80%
- 10Y*
- 28.04%
RJF vs. APO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RJF Raymond James Financial, Inc. | -5.81% | 4.74% | 40.83% | 6.12% | 8.32% | 59.48% | 8.70% | 22.80% | -15.65% | 29.99% |
APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | -11.14% | -11.12% | 79.87% | 49.44% | -9.59% | 53.25% | 8.00% | 106.46% | -22.03% | 85.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between RJF and APO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2011 | 0.50 |
The correlation between RJF and APO shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RJF:
$30.08B
APO:
$75.90B
RJF:
$10.55
APO:
$3.58
RJF:
14.23
APO:
35.61
RJF:
1.21
APO:
0.09
RJF:
1.87
APO:
2.58
RJF:
$16.35B
APO:
$29.68B
RJF:
$6.99B
APO:
$26.52B
RJF:
$1.40B
APO:
$9.28B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RJF vs. APO — Risk / Return Rank
RJF
APO
RJF vs. APO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) and Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RJF | APO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.02 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | -0.08 | +0.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.40 | -0.17 | +0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RJF | APO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | -0.08 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.54 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.74 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.58 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
RJF vs. APO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RJF drawdown since its inception was -69.68%, which is greater than APO's maximum drawdown of -56.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RJF and APO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RJF | APO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.68% | -56.99% | -12.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.64% | -34.97% | +15.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.12% | -42.82% | +14.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.11% | -42.82% | +10.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.59% | -53.48% | +7.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.02% | -26.97% | +12.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.63% | -16.37% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.19% | 16.62% | -7.43% |
Volatility
RJF vs. APO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) is 7.61%, while Apollo Global Management, Inc. (APO) has a volatility of 8.60%. This indicates that RJF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RJF | APO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.61% | 8.60% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.38% | 27.16% | -7.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.56% | 35.27% | -10.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.05% | 37.07% | -9.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.96% | 37.82% | -6.86% |
Dividends
RJF vs. APO - Dividend Comparison
RJF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than APO's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APO Apollo Global Management, Inc. | 1.64% | 1.38% | 1.10% | 1.81% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 4.72% | 4.23% | 7.86% | 5.53% | 6.46% | 12.91% |
RJF Raymond James Financial, Inc. | 1.38% | 1.25% | 0.87% | 1.53% | 1.67% | 1.04% | 1.16% | 1.93% | 1.48% | 0.74% | 1.18% | 1.28% |
Financials
RJF vs. APO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Raymond James Financial, Inc. and Apollo Global Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RJF vs. APO - Profitability Comparison
RJF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Raymond James Financial, Inc. reported a gross profit of -3.74B and revenue of 4.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -87.6%.
APO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.93B and revenue of 4.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
RJF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Raymond James Financial, Inc. reported an operating income of -728.00M and revenue of 4.26B, resulting in an operating margin of -17.1%.
APO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 330.00M and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
RJF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Raymond James Financial, Inc. reported a net income of 544.00M and revenue of 4.26B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
APO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apollo Global Management, Inc. reported a net income of -1.91B and revenue of 4.93B, resulting in a net margin of -38.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RJF and APO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APO has higher volatility (8.60%) compared to RJF (7.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RJF dropped -69.68% vs APO's -56.99%.
RJF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RJF and APO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer