PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIO vs. OKTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RIO vs. OKTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rio Tinto Group (RIO) and Okta, Inc. (OKTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIO achieves a 29.64% return, which is significantly lower than OKTA's 35.13% return.


RIO

1D
0.24%
1M
-4.22%
YTD
29.64%
6M
42.09%
1Y
80.02%
3Y*
23.43%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
21.75%

OKTA

1D
-1.58%
1M
39.27%
YTD
35.13%
6M
33.86%
1Y
11.20%
3Y*
17.84%
5Y*
-11.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIO vs. OKTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
29.64%44.47%-15.36%11.06%18.48%-3.67%36.22%33.18%-2.93%33.47%
OKTA
Okta, Inc.
35.13%9.73%-12.96%32.49%-69.52%-11.83%120.39%80.83%149.12%8.93%

Correlation

The correlation between RIO and OKTA is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2017

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RIO:

$165.37B

OKTA:

$20.76B

EPS

RIO:

$13.11

OKTA:

$0.96

PE Ratio

RIO:

7.70

OKTA:

121.27

PS Ratio

RIO:

1.48

OKTA:

9.40

PB Ratio

RIO:

2.66

OKTA:

3.01K

Total Revenue (TTM)

RIO:

$111.41B

OKTA:

$2.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RIO:

$31.10B

OKTA:

$1.73B

EBITDA (TTM)

RIO:

$40.42B

OKTA:

$235.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIO vs. OKTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIO
RIO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

OKTA
OKTA Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
OKTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OKTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
OKTA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
OKTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
OKTA Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIO vs. OKTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rio Tinto Group (RIO) and Okta, Inc. (OKTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RIOOKTADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.10

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.30

0.30

+5.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.21

0.71

+19.50

RIO vs. OKTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIO Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the OKTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIO and OKTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RIOOKTADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

0.21

+2.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

-0.20

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.36

-0.03

Drawdowns

RIO vs. OKTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIO drawdown since its inception was -88.97%, which is greater than OKTA's maximum drawdown of -84.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIO and OKTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIOOKTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.97%

-84.57%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.19%

-37.82%

+22.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-50.57%

+26.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.25%

-83.43%

+48.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.92%

-59.95%

+50.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.77%

-38.25%

+14.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.97%

18.44%

-14.47%

Volatility

RIO vs. OKTA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rio Tinto Group (RIO) is 11.37%, while Okta, Inc. (OKTA) has a volatility of 33.10%. This indicates that RIO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OKTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIOOKTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.37%

33.10%

-21.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.90%

47.85%

-23.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.93%

54.61%

-25.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.23%

57.49%

-28.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.63%

54.01%

-23.38%

Dividends

RIO vs. OKTA - Dividend Comparison

RIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, while OKTA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OKTA
Okta, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
3.98%4.66%7.40%5.40%10.48%10.23%5.13%7.68%6.32%4.47%3.93%7.58%

Financials

RIO vs. OKTA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rio Tinto Group and Okta, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B202120222023202420252026
30.65B
765.00K
(RIO) Total Revenue
(OKTA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RIO vs. OKTA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rio Tinto Group and Okta, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%202120222023202420252026
26.6%
77.8%
Portfolio components
RIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

OKTA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okta, Inc. reported a gross profit of 595.00K and revenue of 765.00K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.8%.

RIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

OKTA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okta, Inc. reported an operating income of 56.00K and revenue of 765.00K, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

RIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.

OKTA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Okta, Inc. reported a net income of 74.00K and revenue of 765.00K, resulting in a net margin of 9.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RIO and OKTA have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OKTA has higher volatility (33.10%) compared to RIO (11.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIO dropped -88.97% vs OKTA's -84.57%.

RIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIO and OKTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer