PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIO vs. GRP.IR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RIO vs. GRP.IR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rio Tinto Group (RIO) and Greencoat Renewables PLC (GRP.IR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RIO is traded in USD, while GRP.IR is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the GRP.IR values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIO achieves a 29.64% return, which is significantly higher than GRP.IR's 14.50% return.


RIO

1D
0.24%
1M
-4.22%
YTD
29.64%
6M
42.09%
1Y
80.02%
3Y*
23.43%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
21.75%

GRP.IR

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
14.50%
6M
8.91%
1Y
10.31%
3Y*
-0.91%
5Y*
-1.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIO vs. GRP.IR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
29.64%44.47%-15.36%11.06%18.48%-3.67%36.22%33.18%-2.93%15.01%
GRP.IR
Greencoat Renewables PLC
14.50%3.73%-18.30%-0.96%-0.05%-5.25%12.62%18.51%-1.71%3.19%

Correlation

The correlation between RIO and GRP.IR is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2017

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIO vs. GRP.IR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIO
RIO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

GRP.IR
GRP.IR Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
GRP.IR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRP.IR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRP.IR Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
GRP.IR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRP.IR Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIO vs. GRP.IR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rio Tinto Group (RIO) and Greencoat Renewables PLC (GRP.IR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RIOGRP.IRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.10

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.30

0.80

+4.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.21

1.93

+18.28

RIO vs. GRP.IR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIO Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the GRP.IR Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIO and GRP.IR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RIOGRP.IRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

0.49

+2.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

-0.09

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.11

+0.22

Drawdowns

RIO vs. GRP.IR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIO drawdown since its inception was -88.97%, which is greater than GRP.IR's maximum drawdown of -33.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIO and GRP.IR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIOGRP.IRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.97%

-33.00%

-55.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.19%

-12.53%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.19%

-25.29%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.25%

-31.61%

-3.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.92%

-14.33%

+4.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.77%

-11.71%

-12.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.97%

5.19%

-1.22%

Volatility

RIO vs. GRP.IR - Volatility Comparison

Rio Tinto Group (RIO) has a higher volatility of 11.37% compared to Greencoat Renewables PLC (GRP.IR) at 8.22%. This indicates that RIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRP.IR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIOGRP.IRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.37%

8.22%

+3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.90%

17.32%

+6.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.93%

20.45%

+8.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.23%

20.22%

+9.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.63%

22.04%

+8.59%

Dividends

RIO vs. GRP.IR - Dividend Comparison

RIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, less than GRP.IR's 8.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRP.IR
Greencoat Renewables PLC
8.93%9.89%8.09%6.24%5.44%5.41%5.22%5.10%6.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
3.98%4.66%7.40%5.40%10.48%10.23%5.13%7.68%6.32%4.47%3.93%7.58%

Financials

RIO vs. GRP.IR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rio Tinto Group and Greencoat Renewables PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. RIO values in USD, GRP.IR values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


RIO and GRP.IR have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIO and GRP.IR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer