RIO.L vs. PG
RIO.L (Rio Tinto PLC) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both stocks. RIO.L operates in Other Industrial Metals & Mining (Basic Materials), while PG operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, RIO.L returned 22.85%/yr vs 9.48%/yr for PG. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RIO.L vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
RIO.L is traded in GBp, while PG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PG values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIO.L achieves a 30.37% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 4.80% return. Over the past 10 years, RIO.L has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 22.85%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 9.48% annualized return.
RIO.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 30.37%
- 6M
- 42.70%
- 1Y
- 83.69%
- 3Y*
- 21.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 22.85%
PG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- YTD
- 4.80%
- 6M
- 7.34%
- 1Y
- -6.80%
- 3Y*
- 0.62%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.48%
RIO.L vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIO.L Rio Tinto PLC | 30.37% | 34.77% | -13.38% | 6.96% | 32.01% | 0.26% | 30.37% | 28.27% | 0.31% | 31.42% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 3.74% | -18.51% | 19.30% | -5.81% | 6.24% | 21.66% | 10.80% | 34.39% | 9.71% | 2.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIO.L and PG is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007 | 0.06 |
The correlation between RIO.L and PG shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (5 years) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RIO.L:
£124.62B
PG:
$350.63B
RIO.L:
£13.15
PG:
$5.23
RIO.L:
5.78
PG:
27.76
RIO.L:
1.12
PG:
4.07
RIO.L:
2.00
PG:
6.50
RIO.L:
£111.44B
PG:
$86.72B
RIO.L:
£45.93B
PG:
$43.64B
RIO.L:
£44.33B
PG:
$22.63B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIO.L vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
RIO.L
PG
RIO.L vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rio Tinto PLC (RIO.L) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIO.L | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 0.96 | +0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.95 | -0.45 | +6.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.71 | -0.83 | +24.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIO.L | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29 | -0.36 | +3.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.30 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.47 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.52 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
RIO.L vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIO.L drawdown since its inception was -85.07%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -29.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIO.L and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIO.L | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.07% | -29.27% | -55.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.99% | -15.31% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.61% | -26.20% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.63% | -26.20% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.65% | -27.95% | -7.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.45% | -19.80% | +11.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.53% | -7.83% | -11.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 8.40% | -4.88% |
Volatility
RIO.L vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
Rio Tinto PLC (RIO.L) has a higher volatility of 10.67% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 7.40%. This indicates that RIO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIO.L | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.67% | 7.40% | +3.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.19% | 15.64% | +5.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.39% | 18.81% | +6.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.41% | 18.20% | +8.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.45% | 20.21% | +8.24% |
Dividends
RIO.L vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
RIO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than PG's 2.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.94% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
RIO.L Rio Tinto PLC | 3.95% | 4.75% | 7.16% | 5.53% | 9.90% | 14.14% | 5.43% | 5.76% | 6.07% | 4.66% | 3.42% | 7.42% |
Financials
RIO.L vs. PG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rio Tinto PLC and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RIO.L vs. PG - Profitability Comparison
RIO.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto PLC reported a gross profit of 8.22B and revenue of 30.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.
PG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.
RIO.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto PLC reported an operating income of 8.22B and revenue of 30.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
PG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.
RIO.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto PLC reported a net income of 5.46B and revenue of 30.91B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.
PG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RIO.L and PG have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for RIO.L and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer