PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIO.L vs. AXP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RIO.L vs. AXP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Rio Tinto PLC (RIO.L) and American Express Company (AXP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RIO.L is traded in GBp, while AXP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AXP values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIO.L achieves a 30.37% return, which is significantly higher than AXP's -14.73% return. Over the past 10 years, RIO.L has outperformed AXP with an annualized return of 22.85%, while AXP has yielded a comparatively lower 19.38% annualized return.


RIO.L

1D
0.03%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
30.37%
6M
42.70%
1Y
83.69%
3Y*
21.29%
5Y*
13.16%
10Y*
22.85%

AXP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.46%
YTD
-14.73%
6M
-13.90%
1Y
5.24%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
16.31%
10Y*
19.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIO.L vs. AXP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIO.L
Rio Tinto PLC
30.37%34.77%-13.38%6.96%32.01%0.26%30.37%28.27%0.31%31.42%
AXP
American Express Company
-14.30%17.02%63.12%22.24%2.36%38.18%-4.05%27.48%3.15%24.44%

Correlation

The correlation between RIO.L and AXP is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2007

0.21

The correlation between RIO.L and AXP shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RIO.L:

£124.62B

AXP:

$214.24B

EPS

RIO.L:

£13.15

AXP:

$16.23

PE Ratio

RIO.L:

5.78

AXP:

19.25

PS Ratio

RIO.L:

1.12

AXP:

2.62

PB Ratio

RIO.L:

2.00

AXP:

6.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

RIO.L:

£111.44B

AXP:

$82.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RIO.L:

£45.93B

AXP:

$68.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

RIO.L:

£44.33B

AXP:

$18.41B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIO.L vs. AXP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIO.L
RIO.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
RIO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
RIO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

AXP
AXP Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
AXP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AXP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
AXP Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
AXP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
AXP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIO.L vs. AXP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rio Tinto PLC (RIO.L) and American Express Company (AXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RIO.LAXPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.06

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.95

0.22

+5.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.71

0.47

+23.23

RIO.L vs. AXP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIO.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is higher than the AXP Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIO.L and AXP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RIO.LAXPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.29

0.20

+3.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.57

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.62

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.36

-0.04

Drawdowns

RIO.L vs. AXP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIO.L drawdown since its inception was -85.07%, which is greater than AXP's maximum drawdown of -76.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIO.L and AXP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIO.LAXPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.07%

-76.60%

-8.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.99%

-23.44%

+9.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.61%

-31.09%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.63%

-31.09%

+4.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.65%

-43.64%

+7.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.45%

-18.57%

+10.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.53%

-12.51%

-7.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

11.11%

-7.59%

Volatility

RIO.L vs. AXP - Volatility Comparison

Rio Tinto PLC (RIO.L) has a higher volatility of 10.67% compared to American Express Company (AXP) at 6.50%. This indicates that RIO.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AXP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIO.LAXPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.67%

6.50%

+4.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.19%

20.02%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.39%

26.24%

-0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.41%

28.79%

-2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.45%

31.54%

-3.09%

Dividends

RIO.L vs. AXP - Dividend Comparison

RIO.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than AXP's 1.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AXP
American Express Company
1.09%0.85%0.91%1.24%1.35%1.05%1.42%1.29%1.51%1.32%1.61%1.58%
RIO.L
Rio Tinto PLC
3.95%4.75%7.16%5.53%9.90%14.14%5.43%5.76%6.07%4.66%3.42%7.42%

Financials

RIO.L vs. AXP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rio Tinto PLC and American Express Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B202120222023202420252026
30.91B
20.88B
(RIO.L) Total Revenue
(AXP) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. RIO.L values in GBp, AXP values in USD

RIO.L vs. AXP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Rio Tinto PLC and American Express Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202120222023202420252026
26.6%
84.6%
Portfolio components
RIO.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto PLC reported a gross profit of 8.22B and revenue of 30.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

AXP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Express Company reported a gross profit of 17.66B and revenue of 20.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.

RIO.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto PLC reported an operating income of 8.22B and revenue of 30.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

AXP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Express Company reported an operating income of 6.60B and revenue of 20.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.

RIO.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rio Tinto PLC reported a net income of 5.46B and revenue of 30.91B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.

AXP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Express Company reported a net income of 2.97B and revenue of 20.88B, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RIO.L and AXP have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIO.L and AXP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer