RIGL vs. AMZN
RIGL (Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) are both stocks. RIGL operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while AMZN operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, RIGL returned 2.33%/yr vs 21.19%/yr for AMZN. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RIGL vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIGL achieves a -29.77% return, which is significantly lower than AMZN's 6.24% return. Over the past 10 years, RIGL has underperformed AMZN with an annualized return of 2.33%, while AMZN has yielded a comparatively higher 21.19% annualized return.
RIGL
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.51%
- YTD
- -29.77%
- 6M
- -30.69%
- 1Y
- 39.97%
- 3Y*
- 23.16%
- 5Y*
- -5.96%
- 10Y*
- 2.33%
AMZN
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -10.07%
- YTD
- 6.24%
- 6M
- 8.08%
- 1Y
- 14.82%
- 3Y*
- 25.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 21.19%
RIGL vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIGL Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | -29.77% | 154.64% | 16.00% | -3.33% | -43.40% | -24.29% | 63.55% | -6.96% | -40.72% | 63.03% |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 6.24% | 5.21% | 44.39% | 80.88% | -49.62% | 2.38% | 76.26% | 23.03% | 28.43% | 55.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIGL and AMZN is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2000 | 0.23 |
The correlation between RIGL and AMZN shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RIGL:
$592.15M
AMZN:
$2.67T
RIGL:
$19.21
AMZN:
$8.37
RIGL:
1.57
AMZN:
29.29
RIGL:
0.00
AMZN:
0.71
RIGL:
1.90
AMZN:
3.58
RIGL:
1.48
AMZN:
6.03
RIGL:
$299.77M
AMZN:
$742.78B
RIGL:
$279.95M
AMZN:
$348.59B
RIGL:
$125.80M
AMZN:
$152.71B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIGL vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank
RIGL
AMZN
RIGL vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RIGL) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIGL | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.11 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 0.68 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.41 | 1.64 | -0.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIGL | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 0.49 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.24 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | 0.65 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.13 | 0.56 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
RIGL vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIGL drawdown since its inception was -99.37%, which is greater than AMZN's maximum drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIGL and AMZN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIGL | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.37% | -94.40% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.08% | -21.74% | -28.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.75% | -30.88% | -26.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.24% | -56.15% | -29.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.40% | -56.15% | -30.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.18% | -10.83% | -86.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.92% | -28.12% | -62.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.34% | 9.08% | +19.26% |
Volatility
RIGL vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison
Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RIGL) has a higher volatility of 18.26% compared to Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) at 7.80%. This indicates that RIGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIGL | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.26% | 7.80% | +10.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.39% | 20.58% | +17.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.94% | 30.13% | +39.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.50% | 35.53% | +49.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.83% | 32.48% | +50.35% |
Dividends
RIGL vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison
Neither RIGL nor AMZN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
RIGL vs. AMZN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RIGL vs. AMZN - Profitability Comparison
RIGL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 54.21M and revenue of 58.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.2%.
AMZN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 66.77B and revenue of 181.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
RIGL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported an operating income of 11.89M and revenue of 58.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.2%.
AMZN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 23.85B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.
RIGL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reported a net income of 8.65M and revenue of 58.82M, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
AMZN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 30.26B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RIGL and AMZN have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RIGL has higher volatility (18.26%) compared to AMZN (7.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIGL dropped -99.37% vs AMZN's -94.40%.
RIGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.58 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RIGL and AMZN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer