PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RGTI vs. CB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RGTI vs. CB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) and Chubb Limited (CB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTI achieves a -1.74% return, which is significantly lower than CB's 3.43% return.


RGTI

1D
5.25%
1M
14.92%
YTD
-1.74%
6M
-22.98%
1Y
92.95%
3Y*
153.88%
5Y*
17.30%
10Y*

CB

1D
-1.35%
1M
0.70%
YTD
3.43%
6M
8.96%
1Y
10.97%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
15.72%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RGTI vs. CB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RGTI
Rigetti Computing Inc
-1.74%45.15%1,449.40%35.07%-92.91%3.94%
CB
Chubb Limited
3.43%14.46%23.89%4.20%15.97%18.68%

Correlation

The correlation between RGTI and CB is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021

0.01

The correlation between RGTI and CB shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RGTI:

$7.30B

CB:

$127.01B

EPS

RGTI:

-$0.71

CB:

$28.35

PS Ratio

RGTI:

689.11

CB:

2.67

PB Ratio

RGTI:

12.51

CB:

1.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

RGTI:

$10.02M

CB:

$48.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RGTI:

$3.00M

CB:

$17.01B

EBITDA (TTM)

RGTI:

-$263.06M

CB:

$12.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RGTI vs. CB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTI
RGTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RGTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RGTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
RGTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RGTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
RGTI Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

CB
CB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CB Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTI vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RGTICBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.12

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

1.18

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.89

2.70

-0.80

RGTI vs. CB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is higher than the CB Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGTI and CB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RGTICBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.62

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.78

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.40

-0.27

Drawdowns

RGTI vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTI drawdown since its inception was -96.89%, which is greater than CB's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTI and CB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RGTICBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.89%

-50.99%

-45.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.10%

-9.36%

-67.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.83%

-14.35%

-64.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.89%

-19.26%

-77.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-61.37%

-5.81%

-55.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.86%

-10.68%

-48.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

49.35%

4.52%

+44.83%

Volatility

RGTI vs. CB - Volatility Comparison

Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) has a higher volatility of 44.71% compared to Chubb Limited (CB) at 6.11%. This indicates that RGTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RGTICBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.71%

6.11%

+38.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.87%

13.14%

+57.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.36%

17.69%

+91.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

128.92%

20.34%

+108.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

127.31%

23.69%

+103.62%

Dividends

RGTI vs. CB - Dividend Comparison

RGTI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CB
Chubb Limited
1.21%1.22%1.30%1.51%1.49%1.65%2.01%1.91%2.24%1.93%2.07%4.23%
RGTI
Rigetti Computing Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RGTI vs. CB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rigetti Computing Inc and Chubb Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
4.40M
1.88B
(RGTI) Total Revenue
(CB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RGTI and CB have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RGTI has higher volatility (44.71%) compared to CB (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RGTI dropped -96.89% vs CB's -50.99%.

RGTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RGTI and CB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer