PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RF.PA vs. PGHN.SW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RF.PA vs. PGHN.SW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Eurazeo (RF.PA) and Partners Group Holding AG (PGHN.SW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RF.PA is traded in EUR, while PGHN.SW is traded in CHF. To make them comparable, the PGHN.SW values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RF.PA achieves a -13.11% return, which is significantly higher than PGHN.SW's -22.68% return. Over the past 10 years, RF.PA has underperformed PGHN.SW with an annualized return of 3.28%, while PGHN.SW has yielded a comparatively higher 11.07% annualized return.


RF.PA

1D
0.18%
1M
-3.75%
YTD
-13.11%
6M
-14.31%
1Y
-24.08%
3Y*
-8.78%
5Y*
-5.74%
10Y*
3.28%

PGHN.SW

1D
0.00%
1M
-15.29%
YTD
-22.68%
6M
-19.55%
1Y
-29.16%
3Y*
0.47%
5Y*
-5.55%
10Y*
11.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RF.PA vs. PGHN.SW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RF.PA
Eurazeo
-13.11%-22.69%3.07%27.95%-21.13%41.40%-9.02%10.90%-9.85%56.04%
PGHN.SW
Partners Group Holding AG
-22.68%-16.09%3.30%65.50%-41.70%55.67%21.67%59.24%-4.97%31.55%

Correlation

The correlation between RF.PA and PGHN.SW is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.44

The correlation between RF.PA and PGHN.SW shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RF.PA vs. PGHN.SW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RF.PA
RF.PA Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
RF.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RF.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
RF.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
RF.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
RF.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

PGHN.SW
PGHN.SW Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PGHN.SW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGHN.SW Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGHN.SW Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PGHN.SW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGHN.SW Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RF.PA vs. PGHN.SW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eurazeo (RF.PA) and Partners Group Holding AG (PGHN.SW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RF.PAPGHN.SWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

0.83

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

-0.84

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.19

-1.95

+0.76

RF.PA vs. PGHN.SW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RF.PA Sharpe Ratio is -0.78, which is comparable to the PGHN.SW Sharpe Ratio of -0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RF.PA and PGHN.SW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RF.PAPGHN.SWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.78

-0.93

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

-0.18

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

0.41

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.60

-0.44

Drawdowns

RF.PA vs. PGHN.SW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RF.PA drawdown since its inception was -87.38%, which is greater than PGHN.SW's maximum drawdown of -62.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RF.PA and PGHN.SW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RF.PAPGHN.SWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.38%

-62.62%

-24.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.56%

-35.03%

-6.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.15%

-45.78%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.15%

-50.23%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.15%

-50.23%

-2.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.56%

-43.81%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.94%

-11.53%

-15.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.77%

15.04%

+5.73%

Volatility

RF.PA vs. PGHN.SW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eurazeo (RF.PA) is 7.72%, while Partners Group Holding AG (PGHN.SW) has a volatility of 18.99%. This indicates that RF.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGHN.SW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RF.PAPGHN.SWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.72%

18.99%

-11.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.79%

29.06%

-6.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.60%

31.82%

-0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.29%

31.47%

-4.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.21%

27.26%

-0.05%

Dividends

RF.PA vs. PGHN.SW - Dividend Comparison

RF.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, more than PGHN.SW's 6.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PGHN.SW
Partners Group Holding AG
6.45%4.28%3.17%3.05%4.04%1.82%2.45%2.48%3.19%2.25%2.20%2.35%
RF.PA
Eurazeo
6.72%4.97%3.36%3.06%5.16%1.95%0.00%1.95%2.02%1.64%2.38%2.19%

Financials

RF.PA vs. PGHN.SW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eurazeo and Partners Group Holding AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. RF.PA values in EUR, PGHN.SW values in CHF

Frequently Asked Questions


RF.PA and PGHN.SW have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RF.PA and PGHN.SW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer