REZ vs. MNA

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

REZ (iShares Residential Real Estate ETF) and MNA (IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REZ is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE NAREIT All Residential Capped Index, while MNA is a Hedge Fund fund tracking the IQ Merger Arbitrage Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, REZ returned 6.63%/yr vs 2.74%/yr for MNA. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REZ charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for MNA.

Performance

REZ vs. MNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ) and IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REZ achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly higher than MNA's 1.79% return. Over the past 10 years, REZ has outperformed MNA with an annualized return of 6.63%, while MNA has yielded a comparatively lower 2.74% annualized return.

REZ

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -2.07%
• YTD: 8.03%
• 6M: 6.75%
• 1Y: 10.29%
• 3Y*: 9.61%
• 5Y*: 3.77%
• 10Y*: 6.63%

MNA

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -0.14%
• YTD: 1.79%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 4.47%
• 3Y*: 5.95%
• 5Y*: 1.83%
• 10Y*: 2.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REZ vs. MNA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
REZ iShares Residential Real Estate ETF	8.03%	4.80%	12.73%	10.97%	-28.31%	47.86%	-6.62%	24.49%	3.89%	3.87%
MNA IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF	1.79%	8.59%	4.93%	0.18%	-1.61%	-3.24%	2.72%	4.70%	2.13%	5.97%

Correlation

The correlation between REZ and MNA is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2009	0.24

The correlation between REZ and MNA shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (10 years) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

REZ vs. MNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	REZ	MNA
Real Estate	99.4%	5.1%
Financial Services	0.1%	11.4%
Basic Materials	-	10.3%
Communication Services	-	9.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.4%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	11.3%
Industrials	-	22.3%
Technology	-	8.3%
Utilities	-	15.3%

Return for Risk

REZ vs. MNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REZ

REZ Risk / Return Rank: 24
REZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
REZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
REZ Omega Ratio Rank: 21
REZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
REZ Martin Ratio Rank: 28

MNA

MNA Risk / Return Rank: 41
MNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
MNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
MNA Omega Ratio Rank: 28
MNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MNA Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REZ vs. MNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ) and IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REZ	MNA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.71	0.95	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.04	1.41	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.17	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	3.22	-2.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.59	7.99	-4.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REZ vs. MNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the MNA Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REZ and MNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REZ	MNA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71	0.95	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	0.37	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	0.42	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.36	-0.12

Drawdowns

REZ vs. MNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REZ drawdown since its inception was -66.87%, which is greater than MNA's maximum drawdown of -16.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REZ and MNA.

Drawdown Indicators

	REZ	MNA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.87%	-16.68%	-50.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.76%	-1.40%	-7.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.39%	-3.01%	-15.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.05%	-10.45%	-24.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.15%	-16.68%	-27.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.16%	-0.55%	-2.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.68%	-2.83%	-9.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.87%	0.56%	+2.31%

Volatility

REZ vs. MNA - Volatility Comparison

iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ) has a higher volatility of 4.85% compared to IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) at 1.66%. This indicates that REZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REZ	MNA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.85%	1.66%	+3.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.94%	3.59%	+7.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.50%	4.75%	+9.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.94%	4.98%	+13.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.53%	6.55%	+14.98%

REZ vs. MNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

REZ has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than MNA's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

REZ vs. MNA - Dividend Comparison

REZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, while MNA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MNA IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.20%	0.00%	0.00%	2.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.21%	0.87%
REZ iShares Residential Real Estate ETF	2.13%	2.74%	2.26%	2.94%	3.37%	1.81%	3.17%	2.90%	3.63%	3.57%	5.55%	3.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REZ and MNA in my portfolio?

REZ and MNA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, REZ or MNA?

REZ has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to MNA (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REZ dropped -66.87% vs MNA's -16.68%.

Which ETF is better, REZ or MNA?

On 10-year performance, REZ leads with 6.63% vs 2.74% for MNA. On fees, REZ is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, MNA has been the lower-risk option at 1.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, REZ or MNA?

Over the 10-year period, REZ has performed better with a 6.63% return vs 2.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, REZ or MNA?

REZ is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for MNA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REZ or MNA?

REZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.00% for MNA.

What is the main difference between REZ and MNA?

REZ is categorized as REIT, while MNA is Hedge Fund. REZ tracks FTSE NAREIT All Residential Capped Index, while MNA tracks IQ Merger Arbitrage Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and New York Life. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for REZ and 0.77% for MNA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.