PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REZ vs. IEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REZ vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REZ achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 18.97% return. Over the past 10 years, REZ has underperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 6.63%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively higher 9.88% annualized return.


REZ

1D
-1.64%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
8.03%
6M
6.75%
1Y
10.29%
3Y*
9.61%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
6.63%

IEMG

1D
1.70%
1M
-3.66%
YTD
18.97%
6M
20.80%
1Y
40.80%
3Y*
20.51%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
9.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REZ vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REZ
iShares Residential Real Estate ETF
8.03%4.80%12.73%10.97%-28.31%47.86%-6.62%24.49%3.89%3.87%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
18.97%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-14.92%37.38%

Correlation

The correlation between REZ and IEMG is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012

0.31

The correlation between REZ and IEMG shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.31 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

REZ vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REZ
IEMG

Real Estate

99.4%
1.7%

Financial Services

0.1%
18.4%

Basic Materials

-

6.9%

Communication Services

-

6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.3%

Energy

-

3.8%

Healthcare

-

3.7%

Industrials

-

9.0%

Technology

-

35.0%

Utilities

-

2.2%

Real Estate

REZ
99.4%
IEMG
1.7%

Financial Services

REZ
0.1%
IEMG
18.4%

Basic Materials

REZ

-

IEMG
6.9%

Communication Services

REZ

-

IEMG
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

REZ

-

IEMG
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

REZ

-

IEMG
3.3%

Energy

REZ

-

IEMG
3.8%

Healthcare

REZ

-

IEMG
3.7%

Industrials

REZ

-

IEMG
9.0%

Technology

REZ

-

IEMG
35.0%

Utilities

REZ

-

IEMG
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REZ vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REZ
REZ Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
REZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
REZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
REZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
REZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REZ vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REZIEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.38

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

3.10

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.59

11.68

-8.10

REZ vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is lower than the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REZ and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REZIEMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

1.99

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.35

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.49

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.33

-0.09

Drawdowns

REZ vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REZ drawdown since its inception was -66.87%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REZ and IEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REZIEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.87%

-38.71%

-28.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-13.21%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-17.21%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.05%

-35.75%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.15%

-38.71%

-5.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

-7.00%

+3.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.68%

-12.97%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

3.50%

-0.63%

Volatility

REZ vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ) is 4.85%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 10.33%. This indicates that REZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REZIEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

10.33%

-5.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.94%

18.35%

-7.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.50%

20.62%

-6.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.94%

18.62%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.53%

20.14%

+1.39%

REZ vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

REZ has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

REZ vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

REZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than IEMG's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.31%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%
REZ
iShares Residential Real Estate ETF
2.13%2.74%2.26%2.94%3.37%1.81%3.17%2.90%3.63%3.57%5.55%3.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


REZ and IEMG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (10.33%) compared to REZ (4.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REZ dropped -66.87% vs IEMG's -38.71%.

On 10-year performance, IEMG leads with 9.88% vs 6.63% for REZ. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, REZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 9.88% return vs 6.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for REZ.

IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 2.13% for REZ.

REZ is categorized as REIT, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. REZ tracks FTSE NAREIT All Residential Capped Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.48% for REZ and 0.09% for IEMG.

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REZ and IEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer