PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REET vs. ZLB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REET vs. ZLB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

REET is traded in USD, while ZLB.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZLB.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REET achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly higher than ZLB.TO's 2.14% return. Over the past 10 years, REET has underperformed ZLB.TO with an annualized return of 4.04%, while ZLB.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.42% annualized return.


REET

1D
-0.88%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
8.47%
6M
9.73%
1Y
11.75%
3Y*
9.05%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
4.04%

ZLB.TO

1D
-0.93%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
2.14%
6M
0.70%
1Y
10.48%
3Y*
13.02%
5Y*
7.91%
10Y*
9.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REET vs. ZLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
8.47%7.97%2.65%10.28%-24.10%32.43%-10.48%24.42%-5.27%7.48%
ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF
2.08%26.16%6.31%12.07%-6.29%22.99%3.98%27.16%-10.30%19.18%

Correlation

The correlation between REET and ZLB.TO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2014

0.44

The correlation between REET and ZLB.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

REET vs. ZLB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REET
ZLB.TO

Real Estate

99.8%
4.3%

Financial Services

0.2%
23.9%

Basic Materials

-

6.2%

Communication Services

-

9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

18.3%

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

10.0%

Technology

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

17.6%

Real Estate

REET
99.8%
ZLB.TO
4.3%

Financial Services

REET
0.2%
ZLB.TO
23.9%

Basic Materials

REET

-

ZLB.TO
6.2%

Communication Services

REET

-

ZLB.TO
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

REET

-

ZLB.TO
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

REET

-

ZLB.TO
18.3%

Energy

REET

-

ZLB.TO

-

Healthcare

REET

-

ZLB.TO

-

Industrials

REET

-

ZLB.TO
10.0%

Technology

REET

-

ZLB.TO
1.9%

Utilities

REET

-

ZLB.TO
17.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REET vs. ZLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REET
REET Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
REET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
REET Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
REET Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
REET Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

ZLB.TO
ZLB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
ZLB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZLB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REET vs. ZLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REETZLB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.20

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

1.72

-0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.68

4.69

-0.01

REET vs. ZLB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REET Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the ZLB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REET and ZLB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REETZLB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

1.05

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.68

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.68

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.75

-0.50

Drawdowns

REET vs. ZLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REET drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, which is greater than ZLB.TO's maximum drawdown of -39.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REET and ZLB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REETZLB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.59%

-39.55%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-6.13%

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.02%

-12.27%

-5.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.11%

-20.63%

-11.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.59%

-39.55%

-5.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-2.58%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.78%

-4.09%

-5.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.24%

+0.28%

Volatility

REET vs. ZLB.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) at 2.82%. This indicates that REET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REETZLB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

2.82%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

8.11%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

10.02%

+2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.95%

11.65%

+5.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

13.91%

+4.94%

REET vs. ZLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

REET has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than ZLB.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

REET vs. ZLB.TO - Dividend Comparison

REET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than ZLB.TO's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REET
iShares Global REIT ETF
3.41%3.67%3.64%3.27%2.43%3.18%2.65%5.25%5.73%3.84%5.37%3.56%
ZLB.TO
BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF
1.91%1.99%2.37%2.67%2.66%2.39%2.83%2.44%2.76%2.55%2.94%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


REET and ZLB.TO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZLB.TO.

REET is categorized as REIT, while ZLB.TO is Canada Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for REET and 0.39% for ZLB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REET and ZLB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer