REET vs. ZLB.TO
REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) and ZLB.TO (BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REET is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index, while ZLB.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by BMO. REET is passively managed, while ZLB.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, REET returned 4.04%/yr vs 9.42%/yr for ZLB.TO. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REET charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ZLB.TO.
Performance
REET vs. ZLB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
REET is traded in USD, while ZLB.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZLB.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REET achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly higher than ZLB.TO's 2.14% return. Over the past 10 years, REET has underperformed ZLB.TO with an annualized return of 4.04%, while ZLB.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.42% annualized return.
REET
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 8.47%
- 6M
- 9.73%
- 1Y
- 11.75%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- 4.04%
ZLB.TO
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 10.48%
- 3Y*
- 13.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
REET vs. ZLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 8.47% | 7.97% | 2.65% | 10.28% | -24.10% | 32.43% | -10.48% | 24.42% | -5.27% | 7.48% |
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 2.08% | 26.16% | 6.31% | 12.07% | -6.29% | 22.99% | 3.98% | 27.16% | -10.30% | 19.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between REET and ZLB.TO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2014 | 0.44 |
The correlation between REET and ZLB.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
REET vs. ZLB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
REET
ZLB.TO
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
REET
ZLB.TO
Financial Services
REET
ZLB.TO
Basic Materials
REET
-
ZLB.TO
Communication Services
REET
-
ZLB.TO
Consumer Cyclical
REET
-
ZLB.TO
Consumer Defensive
REET
-
ZLB.TO
Energy
REET
-
ZLB.TO
-
Healthcare
REET
-
ZLB.TO
-
Industrials
REET
-
ZLB.TO
Technology
REET
-
ZLB.TO
Utilities
REET
-
ZLB.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REET vs. ZLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
REET
ZLB.TO
REET vs. ZLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REET | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.20 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 1.72 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.68 | 4.69 | -0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REET | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 1.05 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.68 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.68 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.75 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
REET vs. ZLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REET drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, which is greater than ZLB.TO's maximum drawdown of -39.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REET and ZLB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REET | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.59% | -39.55% | -5.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -6.13% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.02% | -12.27% | -5.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.11% | -20.63% | -11.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.59% | -39.55% | -5.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | -2.58% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -4.09% | -5.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 2.24% | +0.28% |
Volatility
REET vs. ZLB.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) at 2.82%. This indicates that REET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REET | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 2.82% | +0.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.90% | 8.11% | +0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 10.02% | +2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 11.65% | +5.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 13.91% | +4.94% |
REET vs. ZLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
REET has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than ZLB.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
REET vs. ZLB.TO - Dividend Comparison
REET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than ZLB.TO's 1.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 3.41% | 3.67% | 3.64% | 3.27% | 2.43% | 3.18% | 2.65% | 5.25% | 5.73% | 3.84% | 5.37% | 3.56% |
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 1.91% | 1.99% | 2.37% | 2.67% | 2.66% | 2.39% | 2.83% | 2.44% | 2.76% | 2.55% | 2.94% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REET and ZLB.TO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZLB.TO.
REET is categorized as REIT, while ZLB.TO is Canada Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for REET and 0.39% for ZLB.TO.
Find the right allocation for REET and ZLB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer